The Amazing Race   American Idol   The Apprentice   The Bachelor   The Bachelorette   Big Brother   The Biggest Loser
Dancing with the Stars   So You Think You Can Dance   Survivor   Top Model   The Voice   The X Factor       Reality TV World
   
Reality TV World Message Board Forums
PLEASE NOTE: The Reality TV World Message Boards are filled with desperate attention-seekers pretending to be one big happy PG/PG13-rated family. Don't be fooled. Trying to get everyone to agree with you is like herding cats, but intolerance for other viewpoints is NOT welcome and respect for other posters IS required at all times. Jump in and play, and you'll soon find out how easy it is to fit in, but save your drama for your mama. All members are encouraged to read the complete guidelines. As entertainment critic Roger Ebert once said, "If you disagree with something I write, tell me so, argue with me, correct me--but don't tell me to shut up. That's not the American way."
"Rachel should have her own show"
Email this topic to a friend
Printer-friendly version of this topic
Bookmark this topic (Registered users only)
 
Previous Topic | Next Topic 
Conferences Average Joe Forum (Protected)
Original message

cimarron 3 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "American Cancer Society Spokesperson"

04-06-04, 01:51 AM (EST)
Click to EMail cimarron Click to send private message to cimarron Click to view user profile Click to check IP address of the poster
"Rachel should have her own show"
I think Rachel should have her own show. Maybe we could see a little class for a change. Rachel is the genuine article and certainly would never disappoint us the way Adam did. Everyone should write and email NBC to see if they have the good sense to have a genuine star for a change.
  Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

  Table of Contents

  Subject     Author     Message Date     ID  
 RE: Rachel should have her own show Howard Dean 04-06-04 1
   RE: Rachel should have her own show Wacko Jacko 04-06-04 2
       RE: Rachel should have her own show buscemi 04-06-04 3
           RE: Rachel should have her own show Ricky 04-06-04 4
   RE: Rachel should have her own show Thistlethorn 04-06-04 5
 Bumping AyaK 04-06-04 6

Lobby | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic

Messages in this topic

Howard Dean 707 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Reality Show Commentator"

04-06-04, 05:42 AM (EST)
Click to EMail Howard%20Dean Click to send private message to Howard%20Dean Click to view user profile Click to check IP address of the poster
1. "RE: Rachel should have her own show"
"Average Joe: Rachel Returns?????"

I'm still waiting for "Average Joe: Brain Returns!"

  Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

Wacko Jacko 2434 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Seventeen Magazine Model"

04-06-04, 10:19 AM (EST)
Click to EMail Wacko%20Jacko Click to send private message to Wacko%20Jacko Click to view user profile Click to check IP address of the poster
2. "RE: Rachel should have her own show"
Don't you see a pattern here?

Melena, Larissa, Adam, Brian W, Rachel, etc.

The show is trying to make a point.

If Rachel got this show look at the pattern, Rachel would do the same and so would you.

If they never have another Average Joe, i'd be fine with it.

And I am making a note of your comments, because if Rachal gets her show you will be saying the same things you have about Adam.

  Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

buscemi 414 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Daytime Soap Guest Star"

04-06-04, 10:22 AM (EST)
Click to EMail buscemi Click to send private message to buscemi Click to view user profile Click to check IP address of the poster
3. "RE: Rachel should have her own show"
Well, that might be the case, but, I don't see it. Obviously, the first 2 girls were vapid, so their choices were expected. Adam fell hard...for Melena. If this doesn't show what he looks for in a woman, I don't know what does. Rachel fell for Adam. This shows that she can fall for a guy who doesn't look the greatest. I guess you could argue that she was in it for his $$, but she certainly didn't act that way. There's really nothing there to indicate that she'd make the same decision as Adam.
  Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

Ricky 1106 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Politically Incorrect Guest"

04-06-04, 11:18 AM (EST)
Click to EMail Ricky Click to send private message to Ricky Click to view user profile Click to check IP address of the poster
4. "RE: Rachel should have her own show"
I think Rachel should have her own Average Joe show as well. I mean she was TOO GOOD for Adam anyway. Why not take a step up and find what she's really looking for.
  Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

Thistlethorn 115 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Blistex Spokesperson"

04-06-04, 12:39 PM (EST)
Click to EMail Thistlethorn Click to send private message to Thistlethorn Click to view user profile Click to check IP address of the poster
5. "RE: Rachel should have her own show"
It would turn out like all the others. It would be edited so that we learned to like one contestent and hate the other so that we would be disapointed in Rachel as well. If asked, she should turn down any more Average Joe shows and concentrate on finding a new teaching position.
  Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

AyaK 10083 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"

04-06-04, 09:41 PM (EST)
Click to EMail AyaK Click to send private message to AyaK Click to view user profile Click to check IP address of the poster
6. "Bumping"
I'm locking the other Rachel thread and bumping this one. One Rachel thread is enough!
  Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top


Lock | Archive | Remove

Lobby | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic

p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
about this site   •   advertise on this site  •   contact us  •   privacy policy   •