|
|
PLEASE NOTE: The Reality TV World Message Boards are filled with desperate
attention-seekers pretending to be one big happy PG/PG13-rated family. Don't
be fooled. Trying to get everyone to agree with you is like herding cats,
but intolerance for other viewpoints is NOT welcome and respect for other
posters IS required at all times. Jump in and play, and you'll soon find out
how easy it is to fit in, but save your drama for your mama. All members are
encouraged to read the
complete guidelines.
As entertainment critic Roger
Ebert once said, "If you disagree with something I write, tell me so, argue
with me, correct me--but don't tell me to shut up. That's not the American way."
|
|
"BB 17 Live Feeds and Spoilers Week 9"
kingfish 18510 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"
|
08-28-15, 01:55 PM (EST)
|
1. "RE: BB 17 Live Feeds and Spoilers Week 9" |
I had a suspicion that Jackie would win, but I guess Las Vegas dancer is code for stripper?
|
Remove |
Alert |
Edit |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
| |
|
tribephyl 11570 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"
|
08-29-15, 01:48 AM (EST)
|
3. "RE: BB 17 Live Feeds and Spoilers Week 9" |
If the comp had included a pole, i feel...no, I know the outcome would have been vastly different.
|
Remove |
Alert |
Edit |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
| |
|
Wacko Jacko 2438 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Seventeen Magazine Model"
|
08-30-15, 02:34 AM (EST)
|
6. "RE: Veto" |
They'd have to get James to vote her out too to make it work. Steve and Johnny alone don't get Julia out.
|
Remove |
Alert |
Edit |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
| |
|
Jims03 139 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Blistex Spokesperson"
|
08-30-15, 10:18 AM (EST)
|
7. "RE: Veto" |
LAST EDITED ON 08-30-15 AT 10:42 AM (EST)Yeah, but I mean she has to put up Julia as a pawn and just settle for booting Meg this week. It's kind of pointless in a way, but she has to isolate James. Leaving James/Meg intact is just way too risky for her. Putting up Julia ensures that Austin continues being reliant on Jmac/Steve to keep her. Literally the only downside would be if she seriously annoys the Austwins by doing it. Maybe they would take it poorly... The Austwins are pretty spoiled by now. But it's a pretty minimal risk compared to the risk involved with leaving James/Meg together. Any competent Big Brother player should be able to give the "you are a safe pawn" speech and make them feel comfortable. The plan would work. Steve has made it pretty clear that he wanted Meg out, anyway, so the likelihood of funny business would be pretty low. Austin has been pretty sneaky so far, coaching James and Meg on what to say to get Vanessa to nominate Jmac. They know James/Meg will go after Vanessa, but they're telling her to tell her they're going after Austwins. I think the strategy is, if they can get every single person in the house suggesting Jmac except Jmac and Steve, she'll do it. It sounds like Vanessa has been leaning that way lately. Unfortunately, Vanessa got pretty drunk last night on wine (who would blame her, though?) and had a heated HOH convo with James. James actually went up to play nice, but Vanessa was clearly in a combative mood. James was pitching that he would let it be water under the bridge and would go after the Austwins, but Vanessa seemed pretty skeptical about whether it was true. James was also pushing pretty hard for Jmac to go up on the block, which is setting off more alarm bells in Vanessa's head. I missed this part, but supposedly the Austwins had a convo with Vanessa after the James stuff. And now they're on board with Julia going up as the pawn. Liz actually suggested it. They trust Steve 100% to keep her and they want a public reason why they can't work with James. They also want to build a road with Jmac. I don't think there would be any funny business if they did that, since Steve really does want to get rid of Meg.
|
Remove |
Alert |
Edit |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
| |
|
|
|
michel2 1047 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Politically Incorrect Guest"
|
08-30-15, 04:09 PM (EST)
|
10. "RE: Veto" |
I said a while back that a Steve/Jmac/Vanessa alliance could be extremely dangerous. It was so long ago that I was even including Becky in that alliance! I'm glad to see it coming around.
|
Remove |
Alert |
Edit |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
| |
michel2 1047 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Politically Incorrect Guest"
|
08-31-15, 05:48 PM (EST)
|
11. "Veto Ceremony" |
James took himself off the block. Julia is the replacement nom.
|
Remove |
Alert |
Edit |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
| |
|
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
|
|