|
|
PLEASE NOTE: The Reality TV World Message Boards are filled with desperate
attention-seekers pretending to be one big happy PG/PG13-rated family. Don't
be fooled. Trying to get everyone to agree with you is like herding cats,
but intolerance for other viewpoints is NOT welcome and respect for other
posters IS required at all times. Jump in and play, and you'll soon find out
how easy it is to fit in, but save your drama for your mama. All members are
encouraged to read the
complete guidelines.
As entertainment critic Roger
Ebert once said, "If you disagree with something I write, tell me so, argue
with me, correct me--but don't tell me to shut up. That's not the American way."
|
|
"There are clues to be found..."
Cherberrie 1285 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Beef Jerky Spokesperson"
|
03-13-01, 07:27 AM (EST)
|
"There are clues to be found..." |
...but beware of the red herrings. This article indicates that Burnett has left some clues for you sleuths out there. On the other hand, it does mention that Burnett is the "master" at digitally altered images of contestants to mislead the "net detectives."Text of article: With Survivor 2 in full swing, producer Mark Burnett has been booking several hours a day in CBS Studio City editing suites, doctoring Survivor teaser footage for upcoming episodes. "He loves doing what we humorously call "video dentistry" a source close to Burnett told us. "He's cranking up the deception dial now to prevent future spoilers. He couldn't avoid the first 2 'spoilers' about Debb and Kel being voted off first, but now he's thrown down the gauntlet. Mark is the master of on-the-fly screenwriting: Out-of-sequence clips, digitally altered images of contestants, curious negative-frame inserts - you name it, he's doing it to mislead the 'net detectives." "He still leaves clues though. He loves that stuff. But only the most observant viewers, if anyone, will catch them first time around."
|
|
Top |
| |
SurvivinDawg 6816 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"
|
03-13-01, 07:56 AM (EST)
|
1. "a la Gervase X..." |
IF the Source Code Theory is an MB-planted Red Herring, he might have left a Gervase X picture style clue. In the picture, the two edited out were the real #s 3 & 4, if I read correctly. So what if Amber and Lis of the Source Code Theory are really #3 and #4 as opposed to being #1 & #2??????
|
|
Top |
| |
|
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
|
|