>How can you say that
>the leading rusher in all
>of history isnt the greatest?Barry
>may have been the best
>pure runner i have ever
>seen,but there's alot more to
>that position.okay, first of all, go introduce yourself to that big long blank thing on your keyboard. Its called a spacebar.
Second of all, you just lost all credibility for all time with what is easily the dumbest comment of all time. Let's not even touch the fact that you totally contradict yourself when, on one hand you say that the leading rusher is necessarily the greatest running back and then in the very next sentence you say that there is alot more to being a running back than running????? You really have to be clueless to write something that blatant and not realize it before you hit that "post" button.
Now, lets look at the logic. According to you, the following running backs are all worse than Emmitt Smith...
Barry Sanders
Jim Brown
Walter Payton
OJ Simpson
Eric Dickerson
Gale Sayers
Did you ever notice how whenever experts put together lists of the top 5 RB's of alltime Emmitt Smith is NEVER on anyone's list.
You really have to be completely ignorant to believe that the result is the sole determining factor in the question of greatness.
Kobe Bryant can score
>50 on any given night
>and his team will still
>get spanked.
...uhm genius, Kobe Bryant has 3 rings. And took a team of nobodies to the playoffs. But since he didn't win the whole thing his season was a complete failure according to you.
Will was just one
>of the more entertaining guest,and
>by far the easiest one
>for the wanna-be intellectuals to
>get behind.
...like people who can't use a space bar?
And oh yeah, go ask the jury if Will's only effect on the game was to be "one of the more entertaining guests". James alone would probably smack you for being so stupid.
Fact is,the best players
>were never really the targets
>until the very end.
..hmm, and why do you suppose that was? Could it be because Will came up with a genius plan to switch the target from him to a group of people who didn't even exist until he invented them, the so-called floaters. Or did you miss that part of the game?
He
>never had to win any
>comps to save himself or
>to position himself.
....thanks for helping me make my point about how great he was at this game. Let's see how far Janelle or just about anyone else in the game could get with that strategy.
Everyone knew he
>was full of it but
>just chose not to go
>after him in hopes to
>further themselves.
...okay, that sentence makes no sense.
When the time came,he
>was gone.
...when the time came? You mean, after he had already engineered the ouster of every other person in the house.
More often than not,the
>flashy most exciting player isnt
>the best player.
..okay, that sentence also makes no sense. Flashy BB players??? Huh? What the heck is that?