|
|
PLEASE NOTE: The Reality TV World Message Boards are filled with desperate
attention-seekers pretending to be one big happy PG/PG13-rated family. Don't
be fooled. Trying to get everyone to agree with you is like herding cats,
but intolerance for other viewpoints is NOT welcome and respect for other
posters IS required at all times. Jump in and play, and you'll soon find out
how easy it is to fit in, but save your drama for your mama. All members are
encouraged to read the
complete guidelines.
As entertainment critic Roger
Ebert once said, "If you disagree with something I write, tell me so, argue
with me, correct me--but don't tell me to shut up. That's not the American way."
|
|
"Whoa, whoa, WHOA!"
ACPS65 240 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Network TV Show Guest Star"
|
03-11-01, 12:16 PM (EST)
|
"Whoa, whoa, WHOA!" |
I think a few people on here are jumping the gun and overanalyzing things here...the problem last season was that everyone thought Pagong would somehow rebound and 2 members (Colleen and Gervase) would somehow make it into the Final Four...and ya know, I'm seeing things on here like the Final Four being 3 Ogakor's and 1 Kucha, 2 Ogakor's and 2 Kucha's, I think it's really rediculous. I also think we're not NEAR ready to look at who the winner will be, or who's in the Final Two...we need to cross one bridge at a time. Personally, I think we all ready know the Final Five, and it was determined by the last episode. Next to go (not neccisarly in this order) will be Alicia, Rodger, Liz, and Nick....yes, LIZ as much as I know some of you just LOVE and ADORE LIZ sometimes you have to look beyond personal perceptions. So that would leave the Final Five to be Colby, Amber, Jerri, Keith, and Tina. I'm open to anyone's opinion on this, but the example was set in the last episode people!!! Don't make the same mistake as we did last season....! Ugh. Okay, thanks for reading.Final Three: Jeff Probst, Mark Burnett, and a fat, greasy, smelly-@$$ pig.
|
|
Top |
| |
Subject |
Author |
Message Date |
ID |
RE: Whoa, whoa, WHOA! |
Annadad |
03-11-01 |
1 |
RE: Whoa, whoa, WHOA! |
Kokoro |
03-11-01 |
2 |
RE: Whoa, whoa, WHOA! |
lambity |
03-12-01 |
17 |
RE: Whoa, whoa, WHOA! |
SurvivorBlows |
03-11-01 |
3 |
RE: Whoa, whoa, WHOA! |
my0wn |
03-11-01 |
4 |
RE: Whoa, whoa, WHOA! |
jtmorgan61 |
03-11-01 |
5 |
RE: Whoa, whoa, WHOA! are you kiddi... |
wolf1bh |
03-11-01 |
6 |
RE: Whoa, whoa, WHOA! are you kiddi... |
ACPS65 |
03-11-01 |
7 |
RE: Whoa, whoa, WHOA! are you kiddi... |
wolf1bh |
03-11-01 |
12 |
RE: Whoa, whoa, WHOA! |
Loree |
03-11-01 |
8 |
RE: Whoa, whoa, WHOA! |
sleeeve |
03-11-01 |
9 |
RE: Whoa, whoa, WHOA! |
Loree |
03-11-01 |
10 |
RE: Whoa, whoa, WHOA! |
ACPS65 |
03-11-01 |
11 |
RE: Whoa, whoa, WHOA! |
IslandFever |
03-12-01 |
13 |
RE: Whoa, whoa, WHOA! |
bergdogg |
03-12-01 |
14 |
Everyone seems to be forgetting IC'... |
cowboyroo |
03-12-01 |
15 |
RE: Ditching your own side |
Outfrontgirl |
03-12-01 |
16 |
RE: Ditching your own side |
PepeLePew13 |
03-12-01 |
18 |
|
Annadad 26 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Beauty Pageant Celebrity Judge"
|
03-11-01, 01:16 PM (EST)
|
1. "RE: Whoa, whoa, WHOA!" |
I think you are right that there is some wishful thinking going on here because a lot of people would rather see Kucha have a chance to fill some spots in the final four. Also, it would be pretty boring to just watch the Ogies knock off the Kuchas one by one for the next 4 freakin' weeks. It would be a lot more exciting if the Kuchas somehow got back in to it. I do think however that given the divisions among th Ogakor, it really makes sens for some defections to occur somewhere around Ep. 10.I think you are right on that for at least the next two weeks the Ogies are going to pull a Tagi and Pagong off the Kuchas. Which Kuchas? Who knows? The point is that there is no reason at all for anyone to defect from the Ogre alliance for the next two weeks. Right now, if the alliance holds, each alliance member is guaranteed a spot in the final 5. Let say Jerri defects this week to Kucha. That puts her into a 5 person majority only this time it includes 4 Kuchas. she is in no better shape than before she defected. Moreover, once she helps those 4 Kuchas vote off the other Ogies, she has to kow they will vote her right off leaving an all Kucha final four. There is no reason then for any Ogie to defect in Ep 8. In the Ep. 9 vote, a defection, assuming another K goes down in Ep. 8, would create a tie and right now Jerri, Keith and Colby are all vulnerable in tie-breaker situations. A fourth Ogie could also have tie breaker problems depending on who the Kuchas voted for in Ep. 9. With 4 of the 5 Ogies vulnerable in a tie breaker situation, I don't think they would risk a defection. Besides, once you defect and even if you are able to then vote off your former tribe mates, the Kuchas will drop you like a bad habit the second they no longer need you. In Ep10 however, I think it makes sense for Tina and Keith especially to defect over to the two Kuchas that would be left and by then, desperate enough to try anything to stay in the game. That would leave Jerri, Amber and Colbsterman on the wrong end of 4-3 vote. Tina and Keith would be assured of making the final four. I think that Amber, Colby and Jerri will end up being an alliance within an alliance and once all the Kuchas are gone they will toss Keith and Tina pronto. In the episode where Mitchell was toasted and Jerri's alliance bit the dust, Jerri went pig hunting with colby and in a heated discussion where Jerri was trying to keep Colby on her side, Colby offered an alliance between him, Amber and Jerri to last "raght ta tha end" She ignored his offer becasue, as we now know, she couldn't abandon Mitchell. I've already tried to analyze the situation in another post: http://community.survivorblows.com/boards/DCForumID2/880.shtml I think it explains my logic in arguing for a Keith/Tina defection, maybe with colby along as well, in Ep 10. I'm not saying that this is what will happen but what I think Keith and Tina should do. If they do, it will be a Keith/Tina/unknown Kucha #1/unknown Kucha #2 final four. Drop a Kuch and add a dash of Colby if the Texan is smarter than he looks. This alliance will crash, just not yet.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
my0wn 40 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Beauty Pageant Celebrity Judge"
|
03-11-01, 03:44 PM (EST)
|
4. "RE: Whoa, whoa, WHOA!" |
....you'd do all you could in the first 6 episodes to make it look like Ogakor was a fragile group and anyone could break off at any time, wouldn't you?Yes and I would also show Kucha was a tight knit little family so viewers would root for them, and hope they could come back sometime to win. I agree that logically Ogahos should vote all Kucha out one by one so their only hope is to win immunity every time to stay. I don't think Jerri should worry about being the first from her tribe to be voted out. I think Keith has a better chance of going first. Colby and Tina and Keith are smart enough to know their chances of winning are better if they are up against Jerri. It would only take one of them to vote with Jerri and Amber to ensure that they don't go. such as Jerri, Amber, and Colby vote Keith Keith and Tina vote Jerri (thinking Colby will as well, cause he lied to Jerri once about doing that with her) Tina would be next, then all Colby has to do is win immunity and he is assured the final 2. It could work the same way for Keith or Tina as well I just used Colby because he has already played both sides quite well.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
jtmorgan61 91 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Hollywood Squares Square"
|
03-11-01, 04:01 PM (EST)
|
5. "RE: Whoa, whoa, WHOA!" |
>Jerri, Amber, and Colby vote Keith >Keith and Tina vote Jerri (thinking Colby will as well, cause he lied to Jerri once about doing that with her)This is interesting, and it parallels a thought I had this morning and posted somewhere else. It seems relevant here so I'll post it here too. Say we get to an all Ogakor final 5; as your reasoning shows, more than likely one of KTC, who aren't a real tight alliance, would join with Jerri and Amber to dump the other two of KTC, figuring they can win final immunity and go against Jerri. The other two of KTC have to be looking this far ahead. Isn't it at least possible that they'll try to keep it from being an all-Ogakor final 5 for this very reason? (Not that I'm arguing any wacky candidates for this week; the last 1 or 2 kucha might figure into this equation.)
|
|
Top |
| |
|
wolf1bh 38 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Beauty Pageant Celebrity Judge"
|
03-11-01, 04:02 PM (EST)
|
6. "RE: Whoa, whoa, WHOA! are you kidding me acps?" |
aren't you the one who has been posting his final four and final three for weeks and weeks now? and you have the audacity to say we arent nearly ready to begin picking the winner? and ythe thought of a 3-1 or 2-2 final four is ridiculous? you don't think there is gonna be some jockeying for position and a defector in 3-4 weeks? i gotta disagree with most aspects of your post final 4 jerri, amber, colby, liz wolf
|
|
Top |
| |
|
ACPS65 240 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Network TV Show Guest Star"
|
03-11-01, 04:11 PM (EST)
|
7. "RE: Whoa, whoa, WHOA! are you kidding me acps?" |
LAST EDITED ON 03-11-01 AT 04:13 PM (EST)> aren't you the one who >has been posting his final >four and final three for >weeks and weeks now? Yes. >you have the audacity to >say we arent nearly ready >to begin picking the winner? Yes. Not because my theory on the final four was wrong, but because it's too early in the game to jump to conclusions. >and ythe thought of a >3-1 or 2-2 final four >is ridiculous?
Absolutely. The thought that Ogakor would gamble a solid voting block by keeping some and getting rid of a few of their own? That's absurb and stupid. you don't think >there is gonna be some >jockeying for position and a >defector in 3-4 weeks? No. > i >gotta disagree with most aspects >of your post Spectacular. >final 4 jerri, amber, colby, liz ...and when this, my dear friend, is proven wrong, I'll be here to shove it right in your face. Final Three: Jeff Probst, Mark Burnett, and a fat, greasy, smelly-@$$ pig.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
wolf1bh 38 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Beauty Pageant Celebrity Judge"
|
03-11-01, 11:52 PM (EST)
|
12. "RE: Whoa, whoa, WHOA! are you kidding me acps?" |
sorry dude i sounded like an asshole in my post about yours -i just had a bad day and shouldnt yell at others posts- but i still like the idea of someone breaking the voting block eventually - remember last years winner was a snake and thats what it will take ! go black widow wolf
|
|
Top |
| |
|
|
|
Loree 8616 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"
|
03-11-01, 07:14 PM (EST)
|
10. "RE: Whoa, whoa, WHOA!" |
If we like the outcome - then Jerri can't win.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
ACPS65 240 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Network TV Show Guest Star"
|
03-11-01, 08:10 PM (EST)
|
11. "RE: Whoa, whoa, WHOA!" |
Delightful! ANYBODY but Jerri. I hate saying that, because a little while back it was, "ANYBODY but Richard". Blah.
|
|
Top |
| |
IslandFever 205 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Network TV Show Guest Star"
|
03-12-01, 01:09 AM (EST)
|
13. "RE: Whoa, whoa, WHOA!" |
Hey AC you are making a lot of sense here. So maybe you're not the mole after all. (It wasn't my theory). The thing that gets me is that everyone assumes that once we are down to 5 Ogies left that Jerri will go first. Nice guys finish last in this game. So unless Colby wins immunity he will be the first to go. He is nice and a threat to win immunity. Can't resist predicting: 1.Tina 2.Jerri 3.Amber 4.Keith 5.Colby Once Colby goes then we have another tie vote problem. I think Tina has been edited as the winner would be edited. Maybe a female top 3 would fit in with the black widow theory. Just a thought. May be totally wrong.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
bergdogg 380 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Cooking Show Host"
|
03-12-01, 02:05 AM (EST)
|
14. "RE: Whoa, whoa, WHOA!" |
Okay, here is my odd, but very intresting theory. Throughout the whole series, MB has been making the Jerri-Kieth feud very visable. Could it be that he has been giving us the final two ALL ALONG, right in front of our faces, and we were just to specluative to believe it.Think about it. How could the PERFECT alliance be made. The perfect alliance is an alliance that nobody could pick up on, and an alliance that could seem impossible, by two people who absolutely "can't stand each other." Let me show you what I mean by going through this whole feud peice by peice. 1) The Mitchell-Kieth tie vote. Now when Tina said she changed her vote before Tribal counsil, it was prolly for Jerri (no matter what dumbass Mitchell said on the Early show. If he knew what the hell he was talkin about, he would still be on the show.) Do you think that Keith could have convinced Tina that she and Colby should change their votes to Mitchell instead of Jerri. I mean, Kieth knew the tiebreaker rules, and Jerri had 2 votes, so he could have easily made his "make sure she doesn't win dream" a reality and voted for her. So why would he vote for Mitchell over Jerri instead?? 2) Colby, Tina, and Amber- the puppets. Take a look at last episode for example. Keith, who was VERY vulnerable, got Tina to step down for "the team," and he got immunity, and his ass saved from saying "buh bye" to Barrumundi. They also kept Jerri's votes a secret, which was a strategy move, of course. They knew that team strategy would hide Jerri's votes, and Keith was lucky he got immunity, cause Jeff smelled votes all over him. So, could Jerri and Keith use "TEAM LOYALTY" to pick off the Kucha, and (fully understanding immunity could fu(k this whole thing up) then use Amber (or Jerri's-pawn) to kill off Tina and Colby, and be able to kill the pawn, and leave each other to go at it for $1 million, while the loser will get a "depressingly-sad" $100,000. So, I may be wrong, but we are talking about MB's show, and he could be pulling the wool over our eyes again.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
|
|