|
|
PLEASE NOTE: The Reality TV World Message Boards are filled with desperate
attention-seekers pretending to be one big happy PG/PG13-rated family. Don't
be fooled. Trying to get everyone to agree with you is like herding cats,
but intolerance for other viewpoints is NOT welcome and respect for other
posters IS required at all times. Jump in and play, and you'll soon find out
how easy it is to fit in, but save your drama for your mama. All members are
encouraged to read the
complete guidelines.
As entertainment critic Roger
Ebert once said, "If you disagree with something I write, tell me so, argue
with me, correct me--but don't tell me to shut up. That's not the American way."
|
|
"Holy #&@&!"
jtmorgan61 91 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Hollywood Squares Square"
|
03-09-01, 08:00 PM (EST)
|
"Holy #&@&!" |
LAST EDITED ON 03-09-01 AT 08:16 PM (EST)This could be massive. From 3bigshows.com: Go to jeff's final words page, right click, select view source, and scroll through the code. Go to the bottom. Boot order? Yes, it works (or at least it does as of this posting.) Edit: Ok, I am a dumbass. Sort of. I realize they are in alphbetical order. Seeing Alicia first, I sort of skimmed the rest and rushed to post this. However, notice ELIZABETH AND AMBER HAVE NO CODE WRITTEN FOR THEIR FINAL WORDS AND CHATS AND EVERYONE ELSE DOES! Wow. (Final chats had the same omissions). Sorry for "yelling," I'm just really freakin' excited.
|
|
Top |
| |
Krautboy 2750 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Howard Stern Show Guest"
|
03-09-01, 08:20 PM (EST)
|
1. "RE: Holy #&@&!" |
Sorry, I think it's just the code for the picture adjacent to his that lists those who voted him off...
|
|
Top |
| |
|
jtmorgan61 91 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Hollywood Squares Square"
|
03-09-01, 08:24 PM (EST)
|
2. "RE: Holy #&@&!" |
Wait, they have code for who voted someone off on the final chat page? What I see is the people who have had final chats so far in one section, and everyone who hasn't in another section. (These sections are at or near the very bottom of the chat and final code). The 9 left didn't all vote for Jeff!
|
|
Top |
| |
my0wn 40 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Beauty Pageant Celebrity Judge"
|
03-09-01, 08:54 PM (EST)
|
3. "RE: Holy #&@&!" |
This is on both the final chat page and the final words page. They have left amber and Liz of both pages for some reason. It could be as a web designer they did this to make it easier to add each persons info later but why would they leave the names???? It could be a trick, but it is something to watch. It's also odd that the links to the ones not booted are to S1 final chats and words, if they simply copied last years web layout why put this years players names in already?
|
|
Top |
| |
|
|
rameses 89 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Hollywood Squares Square"
|
03-09-01, 09:07 PM (EST)
|
5. "RE: Holy #&@&!" |
OK JT, you'll have to help me out here. I tried looking at this, but I don't see what you're referring to. I'm with Krautboy on this one. The only codes I saw were for the pictures of the people who voted Jeff out. Maybe we are looking at the wrong thing.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
Krautboy 2750 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Howard Stern Show Guest"
|
03-09-01, 09:21 PM (EST)
|
7. "Just fill in the rest..." |
Sorry to go post crazy, but this has got me excited. I feel like we have enough information to do some great speculation, without knowing exactly who wins it all. The best of both worlds!!I believe we know the final two: Amber and Liz Almost certain that Keith is one of the final four. We already know the first 7. All we have to do is fill in the blanks! That will result in some intersting speculation! Now this is fun!
|
|
Top |
| |
Siebured 83 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Hollywood Squares Square"
|
03-09-01, 09:29 PM (EST)
|
8. "More fuel to the fire" |
I don't know about the script, but I know KDKA Pittsburgh interviews every ousted contestant about Amber. Kel's response: "I didn't get to know her, but I thought she was cute" Varner's response tonight: "I'm sorry I only had three days to get to know her" I don't know how or why but write this down now: Amber is one of the final two!
|
|
Top |
| |
SurvivinDawg 6816 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"
|
03-09-01, 09:50 PM (EST)
|
10. "RE: Holy #&@&!" |
LAST EDITED ON 03-09-01 AT 09:55 PM (EST)You're on to something! Did they forget about the source code? It's likely. I'm a computer programmer and didn't think to look at it! But now that I have examined the source code, I think you're right. Somebody goofed. I cannot believe that they're not using ASPs (which we wouldn't be able to see). The Spoiler Blue Ribbon and Gold Medal are yours. Edit: Oops, be gentle with me, it's my first post. I forgot to mention that they (the webpage masters) either forgot about the source code or else this is the most well-thought-out red herring of all time. The guy who actually thought to mislead us by putting that stuff there is somebody whose hand I need to shake.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
jtmorgan61 91 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Hollywood Squares Square"
|
03-10-01, 10:24 PM (EST)
|
15. "RE: Holy #&@&!" |
Thanks, but pass 'em on to Gwennie over at 3bigshows.com, along with any accusations of "mole!" if the spoiler is wrong. I never, ever in a million years would have thought of looking at the source code myself - just was the first to see it on 3bigshows and move it onto the board here.
|
|
Top |
| |
Rudyrox 152 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Blistex Spokesperson"
|
03-10-01, 03:48 AM (EST)
|
14. "RE: Holy #&@&!" |
LAST EDITED ON 03-10-01 AT 03:49 AM (EST)Oh Boy! I just went to the site and looked at the code and I all can say is... is.... WHY THE HELL DIDN'T I THINK OF THAT??? Really, it's so simple it's sad. LOL- I never in a million years thought that CBS would screw up on something so simple.. that the answer was right there in the source code for any of us internet junkies to find. Which makes me wonder if it's a plant by MB. Hmmm, think about it.. this is the net and you would think that most of us would be at least a little fimilar with HTML. But this gives us some hope that at least one Kucha (and it's even sweetie Liz) makes it to the end. On the flip side, it looks like Rodger goes soon.. I'm not too happy about that. I guess we'll know this week if this is a hoax or the real deal! Mary
|
|
Top |
| |
sleeeve 3456 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Car Show Celebrity"
|
03-11-01, 02:17 AM (EST)
|
16. "More spoilers?:" |
While I still believe that this is a red herring, there's more to this spoiler than meets the eye... (I found this at survivorsucks.com, and I'm bringing it over here1) Go to any survivor's page that has been booted, and look at the top of the page for the navigation bar: (voting history, final words, final chat, etc.): Now go to the source code and find the line that reads: <!----embed nav table-----> The section of code under this heading controls this nav. bar the last two items have images ending with "final_nav_off" (for the final words page portion of the nav. bar) and "finalchat_nav_off" (for the chat potion of the nav bar). (Links are also included to these pages) 2) Now go to a surviving survivor's page, and open the source code. Under the same heading, you'll see the same parts of the code, but surrounded by "<!---" and "--->", meaning that these part of the page are not yet active.
3) Now go to the source codes for Amber and Elisabeth's pages. These parts of the codes are completely missing!!! These pages are designed so that the final words and final chat pages will never be added, implying (as with the previous source code) that Elisabeth and Amber do not have final words or a final chat. They are the last two survivors??? Personally, I think this is a part of the same red herring as I believe the original source code spoiler to be, but just thought I'd make more of this information public, since I knwo some of you still believe this thing.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
|
|