|
|
|
|
PLEASE NOTE: The Reality TV World Message Boards are filled with desperate
attention-seekers pretending to be one big happy PG/PG13-rated family. Don't
be fooled. Trying to get everyone to agree with you is like herding cats,
but intolerance for other viewpoints is NOT welcome and respect for other
posters IS required at all times. Jump in and play, and you'll soon find out
how easy it is to fit in, but save your drama for your mama. All members are
encouraged to read the
complete guidelines.
As entertainment critic Roger
Ebert once said, "If you disagree with something I write, tell me so, argue
with me, correct me--but don't tell me to shut up. That's not the American way."
|
|
|
"WHO SHOULD MARCELLUS TARGET?"
MikeD 344 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Cooking Show Host"
|
07-19-02, 11:46 AM (EST)
 
  |
|
"WHO SHOULD MARCELLUS TARGET?" |
Who would you put up for eviction? I would think he would definitely put Josh up for eviction. If he were smart, Im thinking, he should put up Chiara, Eric, or Roddy - they seem pretty firm in the alliance. Lisa, besides being a sexy mofo, seems like she might be a little shakey.
|
|
|
Top |
| |
 |
CSHS79 908 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Fitness Correspondent"
|
07-19-02, 12:17 PM (EST)
|
|
2. "RE: WHO SHOULD MARCELLUS TARGET?" |
Josh is the most obnoxious thing on the planet & should be left on the side of the road for the trash man.He disgusted me from day 1 and I want him out & the only reason he's around-- numbers in the alliance.Odds are when it gets down to it he will go, but
then again look at BB2 & Will and how he won.Hopefully the veto
power will prove interesting & play a role in the outcome.
|
|
|
Top |
| |
|
MikeD 344 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Cooking Show Host"
|
07-19-02, 12:21 PM (EST)
|
|
3. "JOSH IS NOT WILL" |
though.....Will was so upfront with his underhandedness (is that a word?) that it made him likeable and funny. Josh is not funny, not likeable, and really is annoying as hell. I think the other houseguests will vote him out in a second if he's up against anybody else. He doesnt stand a chance next week unless someone vetos him, which I dont see happening.
|
|
|
Top |
| |
|
MikeD 344 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Cooking Show Host"
|
07-19-02, 01:44 PM (EST)
|
|
5. "Im curious..." |
why are you called the "red lady"?
|
|
|
Top |
| |
|
Red Lady 2010 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Roller Coaster Inaugurator"
|
07-19-02, 06:29 PM (EST)
|
|
12. "RE: Im curious..." |
>"Why are you called the "Red Lady"?Tehehee..Inside story w/ my college roomie...we saw John Water's classic "Pink Flamingos" while consuming excessive quantities of "Red Lady 21" vino! The wine is similar to "Thunderbird", is 21 proof and only sold by the screw top cap! As dangerous as the movie! We instantly became *Divine* John Waters fans and the Pink Flamingo evermore became our "logo". We have henceforth referred to ourselves as the "Red Ladies". And how on earth did you ever come up with your name, MikeD?  Kindest Regards,
Red Lady
|
|
|
Top |
| |
|
MikeD 344 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Cooking Show Host"
|
07-19-02, 06:34 PM (EST)
|
|
14. "RE: Im curious..." |
Beastie Boys....
|
|
|
Top |
| |
|
jase 187 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Blistex Spokesperson"
|
07-19-02, 02:14 PM (EST)
|
|
7. "RE: WHO SHOULD MARCELLUS TARGET?" |
He should pick Josh and Tonya. He hasn't connected well with these two (perfect justification for their nominations) and chances are, no one would risk the chance to change things with a veto and mess things up for themselves.
|
|
|
Top |
| |
|
mrquisp 17 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Got Milk? Spokesperson"
|
07-19-02, 02:45 PM (EST)
|
|
8. "RE: WHO SHOULD MARCELLUS TARGET?" |
Josh should not be targeted by Marcellas, and here is why. The power of the Veto puts nominations all in limbo. If Josh is nominated for eviction, and say one of the Alliance gets the Veto power, Josh runs a good chance to survive by getting vetoed. Now, what Marcellas should do is to nominate two others (not including Josh), and assume that one of those two gets vetoed (he needs to be smart and pick two likeable people for this scenario). Marcellas can easily substitute Josh for that person, which would make Josh a sitting duck for eviction (poor baby, Josh (that weasel)).
|
|
|
Top |
| |
|
MikeD 344 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Cooking Show Host"
|
07-19-02, 05:58 PM (EST)
|
|
11. "INTERESTING...." |
But why would anyone veto Josh and want someone up for eviction in his place?
|
|
|
Top |
| |
|
|
|
SurvivorBlows 15230 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"
|
07-19-02, 07:12 PM (EST)
|
|
16. "RE: INTERESTING...." |
>>But why would anyone veto Josh
>>and want someone up for
>>eviction in his place?
>
>I just think that if the person holding the veto power
>is part of the Alliance, they'll probably save Josh and
>have someone else open to nomination. In my scenario,
>Josh has no way out if he is the substitute
>for the person vetoed.
>
>'nuff said
>-Joe- No, not really. The easier solution is to put up Josh and someone else from The Alliance. Then even if another member of The Alliance wins, I'd say none of them are going to opt to save Josh (the most annoying of all the Aliance members even to the Alliance members themselves) knowing that MArcellas would likely jsut replace Josh with ANOTHER Alliance member. ...annd if the Alliance is going to lose someone anyways, why wouldn't you want it to be your most annoying member. The problwm the idea of saving Josh for the veto vote is that it assumes that whoever WINS the veto vote would use it -- an assuption that I think you can't make. The best approach is to go for the sure thing and put Josh up when you have a chance -- and then make it clear that there's little to gain by using a veto on him by also making sure that everyone knows that also nominating another Alliance member and then making it clear that if Josh gets vetoed then a THIRD alliane member is going up. If he does that then the only award winners that I could see with the guts to try saying Josh would be Eric or Roddy -- because both are them still hoping to be counting on Josh to be around to be part of their Weel 7 3 on 3 showdown with Chiara, Lisa, and Tanya. Of course MArcellas could help feed off of this and begin to pry the Alliance apart by putting up one of Lisa/Chiara/Tanya versus Josh and encouraging some infighting among the Alliance over what the hell to do -- the girls would probably be forced to vote for Josh (in an attempt to keep their EndGame alliance alive.) Then worst case, Roddy and Eric WOULDN'T vote for Josh and the vote would be at 2-2 ...then that would leave MArcellas only needing TWO other votes (say Gerry and just one of either Danielle, Joshua or Amy) to ensure a 4-4 TIE VOTE and allow Marcellas himself to cast the tiebreaker vote. -SB
|
|
|
Top |
| |
|
Red Lady 2010 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Roller Coaster Inaugurator"
|
07-19-02, 06:31 PM (EST)
|
|
13. "RE: WHO SHOULD MARCELLUS TARGET?" |
I agree w/ you, Cin. Great strategy!
Red Lady
|
|
|
Top |
| |
|
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
|
|
Email this topic to a friend
Printer-friendly version of this topic
Bookmark this topic (Registered users only)
skater, right
?????
|=Unrepentant Hardcore Smiley Thief
Eleanor Roosevelt: No one can make YOU feel inferior without YOUR consent!
