|
|
PLEASE NOTE: The Reality TV World Message Boards are filled with desperate
attention-seekers pretending to be one big happy PG/PG13-rated family. Don't
be fooled. Trying to get everyone to agree with you is like herding cats,
but intolerance for other viewpoints is NOT welcome and respect for other
posters IS required at all times. Jump in and play, and you'll soon find out
how easy it is to fit in, but save your drama for your mama. All members are
encouraged to read the
complete guidelines.
As entertainment critic Roger
Ebert once said, "If you disagree with something I write, tell me so, argue
with me, correct me--but don't tell me to shut up. That's not the American way."
|
|
"S29 | State Of The Spoiling | The M..."
tribephyl 12393 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"
|
12-03-14, 03:38 PM (EST)
|
63. "RE: SOTS | Episode 11" |
I have serious doubts too. I mean, I trust TJ but at the same time, logistically, if Jaclyn is to go it would seem to me to be probable only during the first hour when Natalie can join with the guys and force a tie where a purple rock is used, or upon revote wherein someone like Missy changes her mind and joins Nat and the guys. But at F7, with one of the guys gone, having Natalie trade sides doesn't make sense. 3 against 4 just won't work. Unless she can manage to talk Missy AND Baylor into targeting Jon/Jaclyn and only then if they split votes, and again only if Jon uses a possibly newly found idol and Jaclyn is bounced OR if they somehow plan to heap the numbers on Jaclyn. Which to me seems somewhat counter-intuative to "targeting the strongest player". (But at the same time, I can see Baylor and Missy having no regrets about dumping Jaclyn.)I have been surprised at the veritable cluster-fudge in voting strategies this season so I guess it's not completely out-of-the-realm, but I feel we've already learned the lesson of over-thinking what these people are capable of doing. Complicated/convoluted strategies are just NOT used.
|
Remove |
Alert |
Edit |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
| |
|
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
|
|