The Amazing Race   American Idol   The Apprentice   The Bachelor   The Bachelorette   Big Brother   The Biggest Loser
Dancing with the Stars   So You Think You Can Dance   Survivor   Top Model   The Voice   The X Factor       Reality TV World
   
Reality TV World Message Board Forums
PLEASE NOTE: The Reality TV World Message Boards are filled with desperate attention-seekers pretending to be one big happy PG/PG13-rated family. Don't be fooled. Trying to get everyone to agree with you is like herding cats, but intolerance for other viewpoints is NOT welcome and respect for other posters IS required at all times. Jump in and play, and you'll soon find out how easy it is to fit in, but save your drama for your mama. All members are encouraged to read the complete guidelines. As entertainment critic Roger Ebert once said, "If you disagree with something I write, tell me so, argue with me, correct me--but don't tell me to shut up. That's not the American way."
"Episode 5: 10/31/2004"
Email this topic to a friend
Printer-friendly version of this topic
Bookmark this topic (Registered users only)
Previous Topic | Next Topic
Conferences Desperate Housewives Forum (Protected)
Current Message

sisyphus 321 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Cooking Show Host"

11-01-04, 02:31 PM (EST)
Click to EMail sisyphus Click to send private message to sisyphus Click to view user profile Click to check IP address of the poster
12. "RE: Episode 5: 10/31/2004"
>Nice theories sisyphus, however, if a
>sibling was done in by
>Zach and his parents chose
>to protect him, no mother
>would leave him behind as
>did Mary Alice. If
>she had covered for him
>up to now, just an
>annoymous threat would not be
>enough (in my theory, anyway)
>to make her kill herself
>and leave his behind.

The stress of guilt and being found out could make protecting her son seem less important...plus he has his father....


>Mike seems to me to be
>a good or bad choice.
> Either a good guy
>(ex-law enforcement with prints on
>record) or a criminal. Either
>way, the guy in the
>park seems to be his
>employer/boss since he didn't argue
>with his orders that he
>stay in Wisteria Lane until/unless
>his cover was actually blown.
> He seems to be
>looking for proof someone is
>not whom they seem -
>which looks to be everyone
>except Susan some episodes.

If you think someone is not who they appear to be....then you would have an idea who that person is....and would not randomly break into peoples house to find dirt on them....this woman, whose house he broke into was not even a peripheral character but one just brought in for the purpose of revealing that mike is the burgular

  Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

Table of Contents
  Subject     Author     Message Date     ID  
 Episode 5: 10/31/2004   volsfan     10-31-04       
   RE: Episode 5: 10/31/2004   motormouth     11-01-04     1  
     RE: Episode 5: 10/31/2004   volsfan     11-01-04     3  
   RE: Episode 5: 10/31/2004   Surveysez     11-01-04     2  
     RE: Episode 5: 10/31/2004   volsfan     11-01-04     4  
         RE: Episode 5: 10/31/2004   sisyphus     11-01-04     6  
         RE: Episode 5: 10/31/2004   djandy     11-03-04     23  
   RE: Episode 5: 10/31/2004   sisyphus     11-01-04     5  
     RE: Episode 5: 10/31/2004   Surveysez     11-01-04     7  
         RE: Episode 5: 10/31/2004   sisyphus     11-01-04     12  
             RE: Episode 5: 10/31/2004   Surveysez     11-01-04     13  
     RE: Episode 5: 10/31/2004   motormouth     11-01-04     8  
         RE: Episode 5: 10/31/2004   Pensha26     11-01-04     10  
         RE: Episode 5: 10/31/2004   sisyphus     11-01-04     11  
             RE: Episode 5: 10/31/2004   motormouth     11-01-04     14  
                 RE: Episode 5: 10/31/2004   volsfan     11-01-04     15  
                     RE: Episode 5: 10/31/2004   motormouth     11-01-04     16  
                         RE: Episode 5: 10/31/2004   volsfan     11-01-04     18  
                             RE: Episode 5: 10/31/2004   sisyphus     11-02-04     20  
                                 RE: Episode 5: 10/31/2004   PatrickB     11-06-04     25  
     RE: Episode 5: 10/31/2004   bdemoney     11-01-04     9  
   RE: Episode 5: 10/31/2004   zombiebaby     11-01-04     17  
     RE: Episode 5: 10/31/2004   sisyphus     11-02-04     19  
     RE: Episode 5: 10/31/2004   Surveysez     11-02-04     21  
         RE: Episode 5: 10/31/2004   samboohoo     11-03-04     22  
             RE: Episode 5: 10/31/2004   motormouth     11-03-04     24  
                 RE: Episode 5: 10/31/2004   kidflash212     07-10-16     26  

Lobby | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic

p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
about this site   •   advertise on this site  •   contact us  •   privacy policy   •