|
|
PLEASE NOTE: The Reality TV World Message Boards are filled with desperate
attention-seekers pretending to be one big happy PG/PG13-rated family. Don't
be fooled. Trying to get everyone to agree with you is like herding cats,
but intolerance for other viewpoints is NOT welcome and respect for other
posters IS required at all times. Jump in and play, and you'll soon find out
how easy it is to fit in, but save your drama for your mama. All members are
encouraged to read the
complete guidelines.
As entertainment critic Roger
Ebert once said, "If you disagree with something I write, tell me so, argue
with me, correct me--but don't tell me to shut up. That's not the American way."
|
|
"Moles at the SB "
|
Minstrel 422 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Daytime Soap Guest Star"
|
03-03-01, 03:29 PM (EST)
|
5. "RE: Who knows?" |
Aya, MB was asked on "The Early Show" if he was (I think) doing anything about all the speculation about Survivor on the Internet. That in fact, was he creating false leads. He smirked a bit and did not say anything!OK, when someone "takes the fifth," I say they are involved. Sure, why say no? That would either make him a liar, or "spoil" all the fun! It is great advertising for the show to have us trying to hunt down this aspect of spoilers. We become more addicted to the show. Say yes? Why confirm it? Then we just attack people as being MB moles. Still, no hurt to the show IMO. From this, I can say I think there could be people "planting" false information who are hired by MB. It ensures more discussion will occur and thus aid in drawing viewers. So, his non-answer swings the tide toward "yes." And, I think MB learned after S1 many things he is now using for S2. But to what degree is he creating Internet "material?" With us, he doesn't seem to need much!
|
|
Top |
| |
Kokoro 3899 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Thong Contest Judge"
|
03-03-01, 01:48 PM (EST)
|
4. "RE: Moles at the SB " |
The thing is....this season we have nothing solid to go on. With all the crazy speculation on all the boards, we all may as well be moles. ^-^
|
|
Top |
| |
|
|
|
|
Tamia2001 0 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "New Member"
|
03-04-01, 12:16 PM (EST)
|
10. "RE: Moles at the SB " |
I was convinced for a while that Kimmi would go 3rd or 4th.But posts here swayed me from that opinion,so I went along with them and became convinced she would "be around for a while".(As someone here posted). But I don't blame that on any mole,everyone was trying to figure it out and posting various ideas.Honestly,I don't believe in the honestly of the producers or contestants on the show,and I think we are definately being spoon-fed false clues.Which is a real bummer,IMHO. Last week I correctly picked Mike,but on 2 other S2 websites.(I couldn't get logged in here because of traffic) I assumed that he would be the bootie,and probably get burned.I even guessed that he may have gotten hit by lightning somehow.(Actually,I figured that he was holding something that got slightly hit by lightning) I guessed the lightning bunk because of several posts about it on different S2 forums. But I guessed Mike totally because of editing and nothing that was posted anywhere. But....my assumptions about the editing also point toward a scripted show.So take it for what it's worth.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
shakes the clown 3366 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Car Show Celebrity"
|
03-04-01, 12:48 PM (EST)
|
11. "I'm not a mole...I'm just stupid, sorry." |
As much as Ayatollah would like to blame himself for the last two bootees, I am just as much of a culprit. I am pretty sure that it was me who started the idea that the Kimmi-Alicia fight would lead to Alicia's dismissal....then a few days later I posted the thread about Burnett/storylines and realized that Alicia had to stick around b/c of the airtime the Jefflicia allicance was getting, but instead of switching back to the obvious bootee choice, I overanalyzed and somehow pulled Nick's name out of my @ss (in case anyone was wondering where he's been this whole season)
Then, this week I was one of the strong proponents of the "injury is not serious enough to cause Mike to leave" theory....I once again completely overanalyzed the previews and also completely misanalyzed some Burnett interview quotes regarding the seriousness of the injury and his decison to include footaga of it.
I have decided that from now on instead of posting any theory I have, regardless of how "sound" it looks at the time...I will let the idea fester in my head for a day to see if I can find holes in it BEFORE I put it out there like a runaway train.
ANd repeat after me "I'M NO LONGER AFRAID TO GO WITH THE OBVIOUS CHOICE!"
|
|
Top |
| |
|
|
|
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
|
|