PLEASE NOTE: The Reality TV World Message Boards are filled with desperate
attention-seekers pretending to be one big happy PG/PG13-rated family. Don't
be fooled. Trying to get everyone to agree with you is like herding cats,
but intolerance for other viewpoints is NOT welcome and respect for other
posters IS required at all times. Jump in and play, and you'll soon find out
how easy it is to fit in, but save your drama for your mama. All members are
encouraged to read the
complete guidelines.
As entertainment critic Roger
Ebert once said, "If you disagree with something I write, tell me so, argue
with me, correct me--but don't tell me to shut up. That's not the American way."
Georjanna, thanks for reminding me about Jeff's "better watch out for Matt" blog comment. Late last night I noticed this on Andrea's twitter and thought hmmm:
"hey guys, it has been fun. but I will not be tweeting til June. Then...you better watch OUT! peace and love."
I suppose this could be total coincidence...and I suppose she's not tweeting until June because of college or something, but still it seems interesting. I've felt from the beginning that Andrea and Matt are getting good edits and seem to be the only other real contenders vs. Rob. (I also love Grant and would like to see him lose the Rob worship, but don't hold out as much hope for him based on his edit so far.)
P.S. Re this week's clues: I agree with everyone that it seems to be all about Matt. Maybe since he's the 1st RI returnee ever they're hyping it for all it's worth. But just wondering if CBS has ever done 3 separate clues all about the same person/situation before? (Maybe Russell, ha). Just wondering if it seems too obvious and we're overlooking something? Could David and/or Andrea fit the clues? (Agree w/OFG that Phillip doesn't seem to fit the clues as written.) Maybe the web promo will confirm if it's truly all about Matt and/or point us in a new storyline direction when it comes out.
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -