|
|
PLEASE NOTE: The Reality TV World Message Boards are filled with desperate
attention-seekers pretending to be one big happy PG/PG13-rated family. Don't
be fooled. Trying to get everyone to agree with you is like herding cats,
but intolerance for other viewpoints is NOT welcome and respect for other
posters IS required at all times. Jump in and play, and you'll soon find out
how easy it is to fit in, but save your drama for your mama. All members are
encouraged to read the
complete guidelines.
As entertainment critic Roger
Ebert once said, "If you disagree with something I write, tell me so, argue
with me, correct me--but don't tell me to shut up. That's not the American way."
|
|
"Once again CBS casted lame all-women teams...."
managerr 1959 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Herbal Healing Drugs Endorser"
|
10-24-02, 01:00 AM (EST)
|
"Once again CBS casted lame all-women teams...." |
Heather was actually ok as a competitor, but Eve was just not competitive enough (in nature) to handle the pressure of the race. What's wrong with casting two Type-A Women who can play? We've obviously seem strong women in this game-- (Amie, Margarita, Mary, Emily, Paige) just not two of them on the same team.
|
|
Top |
| |
katem 3315 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Car Show Celebrity"
|
10-24-02, 01:19 AM (EST)
|
1. "RE: Once again CBS casted lame all-women teams...." |
LAST EDITED ON 10-24-02 AT 01:19 AM (EST)>Heather was actually ok as a >competitor, but Eve was just >not competitive enough (in nature) >to handle the pressure of >the race. What's wrong >with casting two Type-A Women >who can play? We've >obviously seem strong women in >this game-- (Amie, Margarita, Mary, >Emily, Paige) just not two >of them on the same >team. You forgot Heather and Karyn. And, boy are you right. I really thought we had broken the spell with these two, but things quickly fell apart. This is soooo lame. To think the strongest woman on this race has been Margarita, way back on TAR1. She would have won, if her partner wasn't an ass. If there is a TAR4, they need to work on this, like NOOOWW !!!!! (c) 2002 IceCat Originals, Inc. All rights reserved.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
toddE 1433 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Beef Jerky Spokesperson"
|
10-24-02, 10:46 AM (EST)
|
2. "RE: Once again CBS casted lame all-women teams...." |
Add me to the chorus. And not only did they cast lame female teams, they only cast two of them. And when I saw the "soccer moms" I knew the charges of sexism on TAR would resurface.Really, I think the Gutsy Grannies were Jordan-level compared to those moms. Why are the moms, especially, super-lame (except Nancy)? Patand whoever were also extremely weak competitors. In defense of Peach, it was really Mary's fault when they lost. But their demise also shows bias, because the previous week they were first, and it was a non-elimination week. Every other non-elimination week, the first team was awarded a free trip, but what did M&P get? Zip! Nada!
|
|
Top |
| |
|
MsShel330 695 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Reality Show Commentator"
|
10-24-02, 12:30 PM (EST)
|
3. "RE: Once again CBS casted lame all-women teams...." |
How do you know when a team is strong? Until you see them race, you really can't tell. A team can seem great on paper but that doesn't necessarily mean that they will be good during the actual race. TnT looked good on paper and see what happened to them. Maybe they should expand the try-outs to include a mini-race. That would give a much better sense of a teams strength. I do agree that it would be nice to see more all woman teams.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
MsShel330 695 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Reality Show Commentator"
|
10-25-02, 12:39 PM (EST)
|
8. "RE: Once again CBS casted lame all-women teams...." |
Maybe TnT don't have travel experience but their youth and strength might have carried them farther than they got. As far as the rest, I just watch the show, I don't analyze these people in minute detail.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
|
|