The Amazing Race   American Idol   The Apprentice   The Bachelor   The Bachelorette   Big Brother   The Biggest Loser
Dancing with the Stars   So You Think You Can Dance   Survivor   Top Model   The Voice   The X Factor       Reality TV World
   
Reality TV World Message Board Forums
PLEASE NOTE: The Reality TV World Message Boards are filled with desperate attention-seekers pretending to be one big happy PG/PG13-rated family. Don't be fooled. Trying to get everyone to agree with you is like herding cats, but intolerance for other viewpoints is NOT welcome and respect for other posters IS required at all times. Jump in and play, and you'll soon find out how easy it is to fit in, but save your drama for your mama. All members are encouraged to read the complete guidelines. As entertainment critic Roger Ebert once said, "If you disagree with something I write, tell me so, argue with me, correct me--but don't tell me to shut up. That's not the American way."
"In the past, who is the second juror?"
Email this topic to a friend
Printer-friendly version of this topic
Bookmark this topic (Registered users only)
Archived thread - Read only 
Previous Topic | Next Topic 
Conferences Survivor Spoilers Forum (Protected)
Original message

esquire 1095 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Politically Incorrect Guest"

11-14-05, 11:00 AM (EST)
Click to EMail esquire Click to send private message to esquire Click to view user profile Click to check IP address of the poster
"In the past, who is the second juror?"
During the past 10 versions of the show, the second juror has been Jenna, Jerri, Brandon, Zoe, Ken, Deena, Rupert, Kathy, Chad and Janu.

What pattern can you see from this group of players. 6 girls and 4 guys makes the sex split somewhat equal. Generally, these are the people that are the tail end of a minority alliance that is being pagonged. As a group they are pretty weak in challenges (other than Rupert and Ken). Only Rupert, Deena and Jerri were people that were leaders instead of followers. However, we have quite a few examples in this group of people who thought they were safe because they were in the majority alliance, and instead got eaten by there friends. This includes Jerri, Brandon, Deena, Rupert.

I would say the past tells us to keep an eyes on someone who thinks they are safe and is running things and instead is whacked from behind. That sounds like Stephanie could be in trouble. ALternatively, the pagonging contiunues and Gary goes.

Does anyone else see a pattern as to the group of guys that are second jurors?

  Top

  Table of Contents

  Subject     Author     Message Date     ID  
 RE: In the past, who is the second ... Q 11-14-05 1

Lobby | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic

Messages in this topic

Q 2569 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Survivor-themed Cruise Spokesperson"

11-14-05, 12:41 PM (EST)
Click to EMail Q Click to send private message to Q Click to view user profile Click to check IP address of the poster
1. "RE: In the past, who is the second juror?"
What I find interesting about your post is the "leaders" who went on to be the second jury member. Jamie seems to be on the course to fulfill this about now. He has fought onto an alliance, and he expects to be in the F6 with them, but ala Keith, Tina and Colby, the grumblings of the other alliance members has started (Rafe, etc.). Can he be the one who goes. It could be.

But also like you said, Gary or Danni would be the logical choices to go next, ala pagonging. But if Gary is safe, ala, Nick in S2 when they were planning on voting him out, another switcheroo could be in the cards, as Danni may not be considered a big enought threat.

Add to that Judd's stating that Threats need to go soon, so he can move futher along, I can see him not wanting to vote out Danni, if Gary is immune. If Jamie goes, he is now "needed" more by the alliance at the next vote. And his personality makes him a good person to have with you near the end.

It will be interesting to see how this pans out.



It is astonishing how foolish humans can be in groups, especially when they follow their leaders without question - States: The Bene Gesserit View. All States Are an Abstraction.

  Top


Remove

Lobby | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic

p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
about this site   •   advertise on this site  •   contact us  •   privacy policy   •