|
|
PLEASE NOTE: The Reality TV World Message Boards are filled with desperate
attention-seekers pretending to be one big happy PG/PG13-rated family. Don't
be fooled. Trying to get everyone to agree with you is like herding cats,
but intolerance for other viewpoints is NOT welcome and respect for other
posters IS required at all times. Jump in and play, and you'll soon find out
how easy it is to fit in, but save your drama for your mama. All members are
encouraged to read the
complete guidelines.
As entertainment critic Roger
Ebert once said, "If you disagree with something I write, tell me so, argue
with me, correct me--but don't tell me to shut up. That's not the American way."
|
|
"Ami on The Early Show"
blacknwhitedog 6532 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"
|
12-03-04, 09:07 AM (EST)
|
"Ami on The Early Show" |
All cleaned up! She knew as soon as she lost IC that she was getting voted out. Chris is playing real low- key, very cool. But he does instigate things with the women.She likes Eliza a lot. She would probably have done the same thing in her position to stay in the game longer. She (Ami) had no other partner once Leann was voted off. Scout and Twila have each other. She dislikes Scout. Scout does nothing- she tells Twila what to do and Twila does it. She really doesn't like Twila. She said (again) she'd like to hold her under water for 2 minutes. Interesting- she didn't say anything at all about Julie. CBC The Early Show
|
|
Top |
| |
|
|
|
RyrieRae 416 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Daytime Soap Guest Star"
|
12-03-04, 09:53 AM (EST)
|
3. "RE: Ami on The Early Show" |
Good point, but 1) Ami said she knew she was going home, which leads me to believe that, even though the editing showed strategizing up until the end, it must have been pretty clear how voting was going to fall, and 2) Julie could have stopped the chance for a tie and put her self on top. If Eliza did vote for Scout with Ami, Julie could vote for Ami with Twila and Chris and Scout. Ami would still go home, and Julie could have used the fact that Eliza voted for Scout to her advantage, and prove that she would vote with twila and Chris, while Eliza then becomes the target of flip-flopping. Scout and Eliza could duke it out, and Julie could at least TRY to maneuver her way in with Chris and Twila.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
|
|
JohnMc 2679 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Survivor-themed Cruise Spokesperson"
|
12-03-04, 10:53 AM (EST)
|
5. "tie breaker" |
This is a little off topic, but what was up with Chris's description of the tie breaker. I mean, that made no sense. Why would the people who are being voted against have immunity?!?With Pascal's purple rock, the only person w/immunity was the person wearing immunity. Unless this is a new twist, then it doesn't make sense. But even if that were the case, then if they were to force a tie, then Eliza and Julie are both vulnerable. Having a 1 in 3 chance of going home is not good odds to try to keep Ami around. Although it is in Eliza's best interest to stay in the game by voting for Ami, it could be a shrewd move to boot Twila that way. If Twila were booted, then Ami/Julie/Eliza would be the power team to F3. Could have been game changing, but it was also a 2 in 3 chance of failure. And really not a smart move to try to win a million bucks. And an AWFUL move for Eliza since she is still in F4.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
|
|
RyrieRae 416 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Daytime Soap Guest Star"
|
12-03-04, 11:42 AM (EST)
|
9. "RE: tie breaker" |
My mistake, thanks!
|
|
Top |
| |
|
Brownroach 15341 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"
|
12-03-04, 11:44 AM (EST)
|
10. "RE: tie breaker" |
The rule was changed, essentially so that no one would ever want to create a tie.The new rule is that if there is ever a tie, the two people (I'm saying two for this example) who are tied are removed from the proceedings, and the rest "discuss" (essentially revote on) who should be the one to leave. If no consensus is reached, the two people who were tied become immune from the vote, along with the person who has immunity. Everyone else must then pick a rock, whoever picks the different-colored rock goes home. This won't work as a tiebreaker at F4 though, since only one person would be eligible to pick a rock. I believe there is now a challenge tie-breaker at F4, in which case F4 is not a bad time to force a tie if you think you can win the challenge over your opponent. Bridge for sale to highest bidder. Call 1-800-BRroach.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
RyrieRae 416 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Daytime Soap Guest Star"
|
12-03-04, 12:13 PM (EST)
|
13. "RE: tie breaker" |
This is really interesting. Where did you get this info?
|
|
Top |
| |
|
|
|
Sue 104 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Blistex Spokesperson"
|
12-03-04, 10:40 PM (EST)
|
22. "RE: tie breaker" |
I read Rob C. has stated somewhere or to someone this was the rule in the Amazon for tiebreakers at 6, 8 and 10 (I assumed he meant 6, 8, or 10 voters whether there were one or two tribes). Rob C. stated that creating a tie was very unattractive. I understood, perhaps incorrectly, that at 4 voters the same tiebreaker that got Pappy was in force. Certainly, the Pappy tiebreaker must have been in place at the final 4 in All Stars. Otherwise, Rob M. would have left Jenna L. to vote for himself knowing she would lose if there were a tie. Instead, Rob M. encouraged her to vote for Rupert. It's possible that the same tiebreaker rules have been in effect since Survivor 4. Perhaps, Burnett so hates ties that he tightened the rules even further to avoid them after Marquesas. By discouraging them so strongly in the early rounds, I believe he hoped they would be unlikely to come up in the later stages. I find it interesting that players in the last 2 seasons have brought up the possibility of going for a tie. I wonder if the tiebreaker at the final 4 might have been changed so that the jury votes a player out. Just a thought.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Round Robin 2914 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Howard Stern Show Guest"
|
12-08-04, 00:01 AM (EST)
|
25. "RE: tie breaker" |
Marko might not have conceived the show with the intention of having alliances happen, but I believe he has said he knew they would happen eventually, just not as fast as they did. IIRC Richard started the whole idea right off the get-go at the start of S1, and since he won with it, it became the standard strategy that players have used in every game since. Of course, it has also led to some pretty boring episodes, but that's a risk if an alliance is determined enough to stick together.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
zazzy 4390 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Jerry Springer Show Guest"
|
12-03-04, 11:55 AM (EST)
|
11. "RE: Ami on The Early Show" |
Julie had one confessional. It was right as Chris, Ami and Eliza were returning from their reward and Julie talked about how Chris had smelled before going on the reward.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
RDIheath 59 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Hollywood Squares Square"
|
12-03-04, 12:12 PM (EST)
|
12. "RE: Ami on The Early Show" |
It really strikes me as funny how Ami referred to her fellow castaways Eliza = Glowingly, positive Chris = Glowingly, positive With these two she seemed to relay that she liked them, said nothing negative or harsh about either Scout and Twila were the opposite she had NOTHING good to say about either and then we have Julie whom she said NOTHING about at all With all the speculation about the Chris/Eliza final 2 I find that strangely odd Also If i remember Sarge was very PRO Twila until after his boot and interview where he was gung ho Chris and correct me if Im wrong but was also positive towards Eliza and anti Julie?? Could point this being true re: Chris/Eliza. Just an observation
|
|
Top |
| |
|
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
|
|