Gosh, I hope I didn't traumatize you. Because I certainly didn't intend to traumatize you. I mean it. Because had I intended to traumatize you, boy oh boy would you ever be traumatized, totally dev-a-state-ed. That's me, I set out to traumatize I don't hold back, I just bring out the big guns and go all out, call out the trauma team to pick up the pieces.

But since you misrepresented what I said, allow me to clarify in most certain terms.

What I did and do say is that it is meaningless to assess a player's game on the basis of realities which were not a factor in that game. I said that in terms of alternate realities you supposed in regards to certain players in S25 who could have perhaps been better but weren't, but I will further make that in regard to comparing one player in one iteration of the game to other players in other iterations of the game. To put all that in positive terms:

The only meaningful way to assess a player's game is to assess it under the conditions in which that game was played, anything else is meaningless.

As for your opinion of S25, I know you were considerably less satisfied with the season and the outcome than was I, and I have pretty much left that alone no matter what trash you put out.

However, when you take issue with another poster's opinion, when you do so in an argumentative manner inviting argument in return, when the arguments you present are in my opinion preposterously meaningless, and if no one else bothers to call you on it and I feel like doing so, get ready for the paintballs coming your way. All just in good fun, though, paintballs not nukes.