Kim was right on when she answered Troy's question. Booting Jonas was the key to ruining his game. Every boot after that was utterly predictable, minus Kat. Troy wanted a different answer. Whatever.
Kim was also honest when answering Leif, but it was a bad answer. Leif being "wishy-washy" might explain why he was in the predicament he was in, but it had nothing to do with his boot at that particular time. The bottom line was that Troy had immunity and a man was going home. End of story.
TMI. Why tell someone in the jury that you didn't trust them when you don't have to? Stick to the most obvious answers.
Frankly, Kim didn't have the best FTC. She probably sweeps the vote if she does.
However, that diminishes her season not one iota. I have always said the goal is to get the majority of votes, not ALL of them.
>