I have always thought that players who cried "Fix" were just sore losers, but after last night I'm re-thinking my position. Tyson's vote simply made no sense at all. There's no way to slice exlpain or understand why he voted Parvati.
If Russell was telling the truth, then he didn't need to vote for Parvati - she would have been gone. If she had or played the immunity idol, then he couldn't have gotten her no matter what. If Russel had or played the idol then Parvati would have been gone on the re-vote. There was ZERO upside to switching his vote. NONE. It makes no sense. I saw no mullets at Tribal last night, so there was no one there stupid enough to throw an extra vote at what was either a sure thing or that had zero chance of happening.
It's no secret that Jeff (and probably EPMB) love the chaos that Russell brings to the game. I have little problem believing that Tyson was pressured or paid to essentially vote himself out of the game. it makes more sense than any other explanation.
A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, always followed by a dictatorship.