|
|
PLEASE NOTE: The Reality TV World Message Boards are filled with desperate
attention-seekers pretending to be one big happy PG/PG13-rated family. Don't
be fooled. Trying to get everyone to agree with you is like herding cats,
but intolerance for other viewpoints is NOT welcome and respect for other
posters IS required at all times. Jump in and play, and you'll soon find out
how easy it is to fit in, but save your drama for your mama. All members are
encouraged to read the
complete guidelines.
As entertainment critic Roger
Ebert once said, "If you disagree with something I write, tell me so, argue
with me, correct me--but don't tell me to shut up. That's not the American way."
|
|
"If Spoilers are frauds or plants ....."
|
redbeard103152 466 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Daytime Soap Guest Star"
|
02-19-04, 06:48 PM (EST)
|
3. "RE: If Spoilers are frauds or plants ....." |
Great explanation GB. IMHO the first switch-merge will occur early in episode five. Depending upon how this occurs and who ends up on what team the spoiling will begin anew. I for one am glad of the demise of the Sleek spoiler as we can now look at things as they are not as how they might or might not fit into a prior posted boot list. Sometimes its fun not being a lemming. RB
|
|
Top |
| |
|
|
|
raidersfantom 137 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Blistex Spokesperson"
|
02-20-04, 03:35 PM (EST)
|
5. "RE: If Spoilers are frauds or plants ....." |
Hi guys, newbie here that's been lurking for awhile and have been having fun at it too, so I thought why not weigh in on this one?My question regarding the "spoilers" has always been like this. There are only a few people in the world that just seem to get things right all the time, and that's "the house". The gambling houses that is. Vegas, offshore betting companies, your local bookie what have. Being a bit of a gambler myself (not a good one, just a gambler) we are always told, "the house always wins". They stack the odds in their favour, in order to win. So then one offshore betting service starts taking bets on everyone except the Robmer alliance, which they have as a side bet. I know better gamblers other than myself, who analyze and study everything and still lose. Why? Because "the house" always wins. So if no one (Vegas, Offshore, local bookies) is taking bets why is that? Maybe they researched the "spoilers" and found out there's a lot more credence to this information than some are giving it. I mean we're talking a multi-billion dollar industry here. No matter what someone who runs a website says about hoaxes or "industry insiders in the spoiling community" I am still of the school of thought that perhaps because the bookies aren't taking bets, they may think that Robmer may be still in at least the final 4 and they aren't going to take the chance on losing any money. Just handicapping the spolier issue myself. Thanks for having me I hope!
|
|
Top |
| |
|
Round Robin 2914 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Howard Stern Show Guest"
|
02-21-04, 00:04 AM (EST)
|
6. "RE: If Spoilers are frauds or plants ....." |
Weight loss spoilers are something that hasn't seemed to have materialized yet in this game, and they usually appear by now. Some spoilers being frauds or plants are the whole point of why we here at SB have a tendency to not receive people who post insider claims and wild-assed theories without evidence very warmly, and Q must be getting pretty sick of them at Sucks as well, seeing as how he booted Sleek and threatened to boot anybody else who kept posting about his list. Sure, a certain amount of speculating and wild-assed guessing adds to the fun, but nobody likes to have people deliberately BS them just to get attention, and unfotunately Sucks has become overrun with these wackos. Occasionally they show up here as well, but they usually get run off by the regulars or the blue peeps. And thanks be to the regulars and the blue peeps for that.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
|
|