I totally disagree with everyone who says Sugar "gave Bob the win." This man advanced by his own merit. What did Sugar have to do about his record-tying FIVE challenge wins in a row to even get to that point to begin with?

Yes Sugar's vote in the F4 was big...but all that did was get Bob into a tie-breaker. In order for Bob to reach the Finals he had to do what he had done up to that point...advance on his own merit and WIN the tie-breaker.

Also I feel the Colby/Tina analogy is not an accurate one. In the Outback, Colby had the season all but won and then he erased his name off the million dollar check and handed it to Tina. Sugar, and everyone else, knew she didn't have a prayer of winning. In that regard I believe the closest analogy we had was Danielle in Exile Island. Danielle knew she wasn't going to win so she essentially had to choose who was more deaserving: Terry or Aras. Danielle got it wrong; but Sugar, to her credit, got it right.

Or another F4 analogy was Palau. Ian appeared to be a dead man walking at the F4 TC until Katie stuck by him and forced a tie much like what Sugar did this season. Katie gave Ian an opportunity to win, but obviously he did not. Sure Sugar contributed to Bob's opportunity to advance and in "Bob" fashion he took full advantage based on his own merit.

A well-deserved Champion in his own right!