LAST EDITED ON 08-02-06 AT 10:45 PM (EST)

>Someone can put up no fight
>and still be molested. That's
>why we have statutory rape
>laws.

--- Yes, I know this very well. I was in fact defending her. My comment was about the way Lisa may have filed this.
>> Later in life she
>>put the whole thing in
>>a different file: The
>> molestation file.

>She was a child, and could
>not
>>stop it if she wanted
>>to because the guy was
>>older and threatened her parents
>>life.
>
>If, in fact, this happened? That's
>physical assault.
>
>Curiosity killed the cat.
-----Again, I was commenting on what Lisa may have been thinking as a child.
> the person
>to blame is the older
>boy, and not Lisa. That's
>also not "curiosity."
>
>I am no fan o' Lisa.
>Fair is fair, though

I thought the Preview button was my friend. I missed,in my preview, how what I wrote could have been misunderstood. Yes, If this truly happened the person to blame would be the older boy. Let me clarify and forgive my writing skills as I only meant to try to figure out why Lisa seemed to pull this info. out of a hat. Curiosity was the word Lisa herself used. Molestation prob. was not a word used by a child almost 30 years ago. I was trying to be fair about Lisa and how she processed this information at different stages in her life. Sorry for the confussion.