She did say she was curious,
>which leads me to believe
>she put up no fight. Someone can put up no fight and still be molested. That's why we have statutory rape laws. The problem is not whether or not Lisa was or wasn't molested. We can't know. The problem is that Lisa has so many frequent-LIAR miles that it makes it impossible to decipher any shred of fact OR fiction out of that girl's mouth. *Yes, "girl." She never convinced ME she "grew up!"
> Later in life she
>put the whole thing in
>a different file: The
> molestation file.
All bow to the queen of "Revisionist History."-- Lisa.
She was a child, and could not
>stop it if she wanted
>to because the guy was
>older and threatened her parents
>life.
If, in fact, this happened? That's physical assault.
Curiosity killed the cat.
Again, if this happened? the person to blame is the older boy, and not Lisa. That's also not "curiosity."
I am no fan o' Lisa. Fair is fair, though.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Lisa represented herself in
>an odd way: I
>get it, but I can't
>do it. There
>was a lot of trouble
>under her hood. I
>felt she was shocked to
>find herself as the misfit
>in that house. I
>was not. She really
>should have paid more attention
>to who really was headed
>for the hot seat.