|
|
PLEASE NOTE: The Reality TV World Message Boards are filled with desperate
attention-seekers pretending to be one big happy PG/PG13-rated family. Don't
be fooled. Trying to get everyone to agree with you is like herding cats,
but intolerance for other viewpoints is NOT welcome and respect for other
posters IS required at all times. Jump in and play, and you'll soon find out
how easy it is to fit in, but save your drama for your mama. All members are
encouraged to read the
complete guidelines.
As entertainment critic Roger
Ebert once said, "If you disagree with something I write, tell me so, argue
with me, correct me--but don't tell me to shut up. That's not the American way."
|
|
"Three tribes in retrospect ..."
SnowBunny 79 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Hollywood Squares Square"
|
02-02-04, 11:56 PM (EST)
|
"Three tribes in retrospect ..." |
Since Australia, I have been hoping they would mix up the format to create three tribes as an answer to the pagong issue. Needless to say, I was very excited to see this format for All-Stars. It may be a little early to determine how well the three tribes concept works out this season, but it might be worthy of some consideration even after the first show. I, for one, am starting to question this as an alternative.1. Does it make for better television? Drawing a storyline for three different tribes in the same one-hour format might make things seem choppy, out of chronological order, or even confusing. Imagine if these were 18 people we haven't seen before. Would it work? At the same time, though, we hear a great deal about the boredom they suffer most of the time they are there. Having three dramas to edit might get better footage for television in the end. Less air time about chasing chickens and stinky socks. 2. Is it still all about alliances? It may practically eliminate the power alliances from forming early in the game. Clearly, Richard Hatch did the math for season 1 and the formula worked for many more seasons despite MB's efforts to shake things up with swaps and such. However, it may force people into early alliances in order to stay in the game. With the smaller number of 6 people per tribe, your odds of being the one booted are better. Fewer interesting outsiders or couples? Perhaps this may just be the nature of the castaways chosen for this season, though. "We're all paranoid." 3. When to merge? Imagine a tribe performs particularly bad in the first three IC's (it has happened before!). How much fun would it really be to see two tribes sit three people out each? Six people (out of 15 total) sitting on the sidelines during an immunity challenge doesn't sound all that entertaining. Any other observations?
|
|
Top |
| |
|
SnowBunny 79 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Hollywood Squares Square"
|
02-03-04, 10:16 AM (EST)
|
3. "RE: Three tribes in retrospect ..." |
Thanks. I wondered about the fanatics forum myself, but it didn't seem to fit with the other discussion topics I see in that forum.
|
|
Top |
| |
kary1371 631 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Reality Show Commentator"
|
02-03-04, 11:47 AM (EST)
|
6. "RE: Three tribes in retrospect ..." |
I thought I read somewhere a while back something about three tribes merging into 2, before the final merge. Anyone heard something to that effect?
|
|
Top |
| |
|
|
|
dabo 26942 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"
|
02-03-04, 11:37 PM (EST)
|
11. "RE: Three tribes in retrospect ..." |
Or it could be a complete reshuffle with members of all three tribes having to take their chances. If I was EPMB that's what I'd do with this bunch.
|
|
Top |
| |
GetMeOuttaHere 43 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Beauty Pageant Celebrity Judge"
|
02-03-04, 11:44 PM (EST)
|
13. "RE: Three tribes in retrospect ..." |
I wanted to see three tribes too,but this is not working. TPTB need to break up the alliances in the future,and we need to see more of the people playing the game to get interested.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
GlassJax 1062 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Politically Incorrect Guest"
|
02-04-04, 00:45 AM (EST)
|
14. "RE: Three tribes in retrospect ..." |
How can you say "this is not working" after one episode. Give it a few eeks before you pass judgement.
Too judgemental
|
|
Top |
| |
|
Blow by Blow 895 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Fitness Correspondent"
|
02-04-04, 06:53 PM (EST)
|
16. "Merge options" |
I'm just hoping that come merge time (into two tribes) they try to balance the former tribes within the new tribes. Example:Mogo Mogo has 5 Chapera has 5 Saboga has 4 So they do it this way: Tribe 1: 2 mogo, 3 chap, 2 sabog Tribe 2: 3 mogo, 2 chap, 2 sabog In those new tribes there wouldn't be a clear dominance and in fact the tribes with fewer members would be inclined to partner with the other minority tribe. Or maybe tribe loyalty will play an even smaller role this time around. Just talking out loud here. -BbB
|
|
Top |
| |
|
Loree 8616 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"
|
02-04-04, 07:57 PM (EST)
|
17. "RE: Merge options" |
I think the fact that the players all know each other may completely change things. Instead of staying with your original tribe you may ally with your buddies from before the show.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
|
|