|
|
PLEASE NOTE: The Reality TV World Message Boards are filled with desperate
attention-seekers pretending to be one big happy PG/PG13-rated family. Don't
be fooled. Trying to get everyone to agree with you is like herding cats,
but intolerance for other viewpoints is NOT welcome and respect for other
posters IS required at all times. Jump in and play, and you'll soon find out
how easy it is to fit in, but save your drama for your mama. All members are
encouraged to read the
complete guidelines.
As entertainment critic Roger
Ebert once said, "If you disagree with something I write, tell me so, argue
with me, correct me--but don't tell me to shut up. That's not the American way."
|
|
"Fight results so far"
ChicagoTRS 39 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Beauty Pageant Celebrity Judge"
|
04-26-05, 01:03 PM (EST)
|
20. "RE: Yeah" |
Reading Alfonso's account of the fight...he judged it 2-2 going into the final round. He said: "Sergio was landing more punches and was winning the round, until 10 seconds before the bell. Ishe landed a right hook on Sergio’s temple that wobbled him." Even if this was a very hard blow...it is still just one punch and depending how they are judging it would generally not be enough to overcome the quantity of punches that Sergio had landed throughout the round. I do agree the judges score cards for this fight were definitely funny when compared to the first hand accounts of the fight. But then again most of the rounds seemed very close so that could lead to some natural disparity in the judges scores. Additionally the style of each fighter would lend itself to judges not being on the same page with Sergio basically throwing a lot of punches and Ishe throwing fewer but with more power...would depend on how each judge values quantity vs power. Not sure how anyone could score it unanimous Sergio though as if there was a decisive round it was round 3 to Ishe. In the end I do think the deserving/winning fighter was selected correctly even if the judges scorecards were a little out of whack. This is the first fight where there is any real question which to me is remarkable. It seems in most regular boxing matches most times the judging is very questionable. Even in this fight I do think they got it right in the end.
|
Remove |
Alert |
Edit |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
| |
|
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
|
|