|
|
PLEASE NOTE: The Reality TV World Message Boards are filled with desperate
attention-seekers pretending to be one big happy PG/PG13-rated family. Don't
be fooled. Trying to get everyone to agree with you is like herding cats,
but intolerance for other viewpoints is NOT welcome and respect for other
posters IS required at all times. Jump in and play, and you'll soon find out
how easy it is to fit in, but save your drama for your mama. All members are
encouraged to read the
complete guidelines.
As entertainment critic Roger
Ebert once said, "If you disagree with something I write, tell me so, argue
with me, correct me--but don't tell me to shut up. That's not the American way."
|
|
"Why "Non-Elimination" for Vote?"
|
|
|
ulalame 778 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Fitness Correspondent"
|
10-29-02, 11:58 AM (EST)
|
3. "RE: Why "Non-Elimination" for Vote?" |
LAST EDITED ON 10-29-02 AT 12:00 PM (EST)Although I didn't watch the first season, it's my understanding that they had one non-elimination round when there were 7 teams remaining; given that there was one less team to begin with (11 vs. the current 12), that means they did a non-elimination round in the 5th episode, after 4 teams had been booted--the same as now. In Season 2, I believe the non-elimination round started later in the game. Anybody have the actual statistics of when/how often they've done non-elimination rounds in the past two seasons? In any event, I see nothing in the preview to suggest that it isn't a non-elimination round--it's as good a guess as any. Re. Aaron/Arianne, well, they came in LAST this past episode. There are some previews that suggest that their car breaks down. Ergo, I think it's a very reasonable pick--even though they were doing well earlier in the game, that doesn't mean they are somehow exempt from messing up, as the soccer challenge showed us.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
managerr 1959 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Herbal Healing Drugs Endorser"
|
10-29-02, 12:07 PM (EST)
|
4. "RE: Why "Non-Elimination" for Vote?" |
In TAR2, the elimination leg didn't occur until they were *6* teams left. (Week #6 - Mary & Peach wins the first non-elim leg right before their subsequent elimination) In TAR1 it happened when there were also *6* teams. (Team Guido pushes Nancy, Lenny and Karyn are saved) In both cases, it happened during Week #6. We are only on Week #5 in TAR3.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
managerr 1959 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Herbal Healing Drugs Endorser"
|
10-29-02, 12:17 PM (EST)
|
7. "RE: Why "Non-Elimination" for Vote?" |
Also, next week TAR is being pre-empted for the Country Music Awards. Do you really think they'll show a non-elimination leg and then not show TAR again next week? That would be a big momentum loss. I'd advise everyone to wait until the TV Guide listing for the 11/13 episode comes out tomorrow. That way we'll be able to see if it's a double episode that week. (Double Episodes = 1 non elim leg)
|
|
Top |
| |
|
|
|
ulalame 778 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Fitness Correspondent"
|
10-29-02, 12:29 PM (EST)
|
13. "RE: Why "Non-Elimination" for Vote?" |
Thanks, Fester. Guess I'll have to reconsider my vote for non-elimination now, since I was basing it on a wrong precedent. Although, I still think it's a possibility--you'd think these players would've watched the last two seasons, and wouldn't it make sence for the producers to shake it up a bit, so the show is not so predictable?
|
|
Top |
| |
realitybites 1174 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Politically Incorrect Guest"
|
10-29-02, 03:01 PM (EST)
|
16. "One reason why not" |
According to the TV listings on Yahoo!, The Early Show is having the latest "castoffs" from TAR on their show 10/31.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
|
sleeeve 3456 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Car Show Celebrity"
|
10-29-02, 07:12 PM (EST)
|
18. "Was Thinking the Same thing..." |
LAST EDITED ON 10-29-02 AT 07:31 PM (EST)I hadn't even altered the rules yet to ALLOW a vote of "No Team Will Be Eliminated". In the past two seasons, I have intentionally not added that rule to the thread until after 5 teams have already been elliminated to discourage new posters who aren't familiar with the TAR pattern of elim/non-elim from wasting their vote. For some illogical reason as soon as people see that as an option, everyone opts to use it, even though it makes ABSOLUTELY NO SEENSE for no team to be eliminated at this point... especially since CBS says that another team will be eliminated this week, and the Early Show has the "most recent team eliminated from TAR" as a guest on thier show Thursdya morning (won't they be surprised ). Last season when I first added the non-elim to the rules, over half of our voters picked it... even though I said in my opening "I doubt anyone's ready to use this yet, because we have evidence that someone will be eliminated this week"... ...this is why we have a spoilers board, but no individual "speculation" board (as some sites do)... because we want people to vote with their brains... not like sheep. I suppose that I'll alter the rules for next week-- one week earlier than I had planned-- to allow for non-elim. But mark my words... the first non-elim will be in episode 8, in order to maintain the same pattern that we've had in every series in the past (but adjusting for extra team)... watch: E1 - Team #12 Eliminated E2 - Team #11 Eliminated E3 - Team #10 Eliminated E4 - Team #9 Eliminated E5 - Team #8 Eliminated E6 - Team #7 Eliminated E7 - Team #6 Eliminated E8 - No Team Eliminated E9 - Team #5 Eliminated E10 - No Team Eliminated E11 - Team #4 Eliminated E12 - No Team Eliminated E13 - 3 Teams Race To Finish Okay... that's my speculation on this matter... but go ahead and vote how you want to... we'll still count them (but I'll continue to call them a "waste of a vote")
You never know what might be up my sleeeve...
|
|
Top |
| |
|
|
|
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
|
|