Good points, Packard. But personally I think we should keep in mind that what Larissa consideres to be attractive may be different than what some people expect.

>Larissa
>is also someone that I think
>many guys would like for
>a real girl friend if this were
>possible.

Exactly!

>Her web site,
>www.larissameek.com, is obviously the work of
>a young woman
>who wants to be taken seriously
>for her art, and she
>is not
>just a pretty face trying to
>get ahead for this quality
>alone.

Well stated!

>Melanoma was your typical airhead Kansas
>City Chiefs cheer
>leader, and as a Raider fan
>I should have known she
>was not
>going to choose one of the
>Joes!!!

Very true! There is a big difference between jock-chasing airheads and sensitive artists, as I've said from the beginning.

>Larissa has a bigger problem than
>Melanoma, and that is that
>there are no standout really good
>guy Joes like Adam in
>the first series.

Well, In terms of personality, all the Joes are *good guys* this time around, as opposed to Average Joe I, when a lot of them fought among themselves.

I think your point is that In terms of looks, the Joes this time are not as attractive as the first time around. What you may be forgetting is that Larissa seems to like latins and italians, and there are plenty of them among both the Joes and the himbos this time. So attractiveness is in the eye of the beholder.

>IMHO, had Adam
>been in this group, Larissa
>might have chosen him........

Maybe, maybe not.

>As
>it stands, if she chooses
>a Joe, it will probably be
>Tony, based on their mutual
>interest in art.

And that she seems to like latins.

>If she
>doesn't choose one of the
>Joes it will be because this group isn't
>that great, and I will
>still respect her in the morning afterwards....
> (As long as she doesn't choose the
>despicable Michael C!!!)

I agree, although obviously I think she will chose Tony.