The Amazing Race   American Idol   The Apprentice   The Bachelor   The Bachelorette   Big Brother   The Biggest Loser
Dancing with the Stars   So You Think You Can Dance   Survivor   Top Model   The Voice   The X Factor       Reality TV World
   
Reality TV World Message Board Forums
PLEASE NOTE: The Reality TV World Message Boards are filled with desperate attention-seekers pretending to be one big happy PG/PG13-rated family. Don't be fooled. Trying to get everyone to agree with you is like herding cats, but intolerance for other viewpoints is NOT welcome and respect for other posters IS required at all times. Jump in and play, and you'll soon find out how easy it is to fit in, but save your drama for your mama. All members are encouraged to read the complete guidelines. As entertainment critic Roger Ebert once said, "If you disagree with something I write, tell me so, argue with me, correct me--but don't tell me to shut up. That's not the American way."
"USA Today article"
Email this topic to a friend
Printer-friendly version of this topic
Bookmark this topic (Registered users only)
Archived thread - Read only 
Previous Topic | Next Topic 
Conferences Survivor Spoilers Forum (Protected)
Original message

Bebo 21083 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"

02-28-02, 01:15 PM (EST)
Click to EMail Bebo Click to send private message to Bebo Click to view user profile Click to check IP address of the poster
"USA Today article"
http://www.usatoday.com/life/enter/tv/2002/2002-02-28-survivor4.htm

'Survivor' goes back to the South Pacific

By Robert Bianco, USA TODAY


By Monty Brinton CBS
Producer Mark Burnett, left, and host Jeff Probst get nostalgic.

Survivor hopes to win you back by going back.

Ever since its first, phenomenally popular South Seas installment, Survivor has endured a decline in ratings and a rise in critical drubbings. Now, after two increasingly fun-free games in Australia and Africa, the show seeks to recover its lost appeal by returning to its more idyllic roots.

And so with tonight's premiere of the fourth run, Survivor: Marquesas (CBS, 8 p.m. ET/PT), producer Mark Burnett returns to the South Pacific — specifically, to the island paradise of Nuku Hiva. That means a welcome return of sand and surf and swaying palms, not to mention bikinis, bathing suits and bandanna halters.

That also means, from what we can tell, an abundant supply of clean water — a blessed relief after watching the African crew strain dung before they could drink. And while they've been given no food rations this time (the show's latest twist), the islanders don't have any trouble finding something to eat, at least not in the early going. I fear that means we're in for some repeats of Australia's bloody pig escapade, but for tonight, the islanders harvest rather than slaughter.

Best of all, after three games, the survivors finally have learned how to make fire. (It apparently helps to have someone along who knows yoga.) And you thought these people had no learning curve.

But they're not the only ones who have wised up. Though it's too soon to be sure, it seems possible Survivor has learned that while we may want to see the contestants struggle, we don't want to see them tortured. If so, thank you.

Though CBS made only a portion of tonight's premiere available for preview (the tape cuts off at the immunity challenge), the set-up is familiar. As the 16 new players swim their way to the island, we're introduced to the two tribes: Rotu and Maraamu.

For whatever an early impression is worth, the players seem more likable than the crew in Africa, or at least less hateful. Even so, they know their roles, and they begin sniping at each other almost instantly. I'm just curious: Would it be impossible to find 16 Americans who might be willing to spend one full day together before they start complaining about one another?

Still, as insults go, give credit to Maraamu's Vecepia Towery for one of Survivor's all-time nastiest and best-delivered blows: "Sarah has a very cute body. She paid a lot for it."

Despite the improvements, the show still suffers from the been-there/done-that vapors that pervade the entire reality game show genre (which is why it might have been wiser to wait a while longer between installments).

Marquesas may not provoke the fury and disdain that greeted Survivor: Africa, but it's also unlikely to inspire the fervor that greeted the original.

Some things, you just can't get back.

Bebo Notes:
- We have proof that both tribes make fire - confirming our prior speculation.
- Is Peter actually useful for the fire endeavor, given the yoga comment? Adds an interesting question to the boot mix. If he proved useful, would he be voted off for grossing everyone out? Or would they decide that they already got what they needed out of him and he could go? (sorry for the double meaning)

  Top

  Table of Contents

  Subject     Author     Message Date     ID  
 RE: USA Today article SurvivorBlows 02-28-02 1
   RE: USA Today article Bebo 02-28-02 3
 RE: USA Today article smiles 02-28-02 2

Lobby | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic

Messages in this topic

SurvivorBlows 15230 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"

02-28-02, 01:38 PM (EST)
Click to EMail SurvivorBlows Click to send private message to SurvivorBlows Click to view user profile Click to check IP address of the poster
1. "RE: USA Today article"
LAST EDITED ON 02-28-02 AT 02:02 PM (EST)

>Still, as insults go, give credit to Maraamu's Vecepia Towery for
>one of Survivor's all-time nastiest and best-delivered blows: "Sarah has
>a very cute body. She paid a lot for it."

OUCH... the cat claws came out VERY quickly, didn't they? wow.

>Bebo Notes:
>- We have proof that both tribes make fire - confirming
>our prior speculation.
>- Is Peter actually useful for the fire endeavor, given the
>yoga comment? Adds an interesting question to the boot
>mix. If he proved useful, would he be voted
>off for grossing everyone out? Or would they decide
>that they already got what they needed out of him
>and he could go? (sorry for the double meaning)\

I understand what you are trying to say, and yes, it would seem to make little sense to vote out the guy who "showed you" how to make fire, but really, if you have a magnifying glass -- exactly how hard is it to hold the glass in the open sun over a nice little dry cluster of kindling-type material???

...what is there really for Peter to "have shown" anyone?

But the comment is interesting none the less...

-SB

  Top

Bebo 21083 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"

02-28-02, 02:15 PM (EST)
Click to EMail Bebo Click to send private message to Bebo Click to view user profile Click to check IP address of the poster
3. "RE: USA Today article"
Actually, what I was trying to say was that it brings back up Richard's usefulness question from S1. He took over the spear fishing so that the tribe would need him and not vote him off.

Normally, the first vote is for someone who has proven not to be useful, typically by a poor performance in the challenges. But in this case, we might finally have someone who had been of use voted off, since after all, once the fire was started, they didn't need him anymore.

Interesting dilemma for the tribe - voting off the disliked even if he has already proven to be useful.

  Top

smiles 675 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Reality Show Commentator"

02-28-02, 01:59 PM (EST)
Click to EMail smiles Click to send private message to smiles Click to view user profile Click to check IP address of the poster
2. "RE: USA Today article"
>
>
>>
>Though CBS made only a portion
>of tonight's premiere available for
>preview (the tape cuts off
>at the immunity challenge), the
>set-up is familiar. As the
>16 new players swim their
>way to the island, we're
>introduced to the two tribes:
>Rotu and Maraamu.
>
>
So, it is decided that contestants have to swim to their camps. I wonder how Sean is going to do . . .
  Top


Remove

Lobby | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic

p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
about this site   •   advertise on this site  •   contact us  •   privacy policy   •