|
|
PLEASE NOTE: The Reality TV World Message Boards are filled with desperate
attention-seekers pretending to be one big happy PG/PG13-rated family. Don't
be fooled. Trying to get everyone to agree with you is like herding cats,
but intolerance for other viewpoints is NOT welcome and respect for other
posters IS required at all times. Jump in and play, and you'll soon find out
how easy it is to fit in, but save your drama for your mama. All members are
encouraged to read the
complete guidelines.
As entertainment critic Roger
Ebert once said, "If you disagree with something I write, tell me so, argue
with me, correct me--but don't tell me to shut up. That's not the American way."
|
|
"mega-comprehensive/out-there spoiler analysis"
herewiss13 8 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "American Cancer Society Spokesperson"
|
12-21-01, 03:33 AM (EST)
|
"mega-comprehensive/out-there spoiler analysis" |
http://pub53.ezboard.com/fsurvivorsucksfrm2.showMessageRange?topicID=10437.topic&start=1&stop=20This is an _extremely_ long and detailed post showing how MB has edited the show to portray Ethan as Jesus, through a variety of subtle methods. I'm not exactly sure what to make of it, myself; so I was hoping other, more learned, people might comment. It seems scarily plausible...but also very fringe-y. My apologies if this is somehow redundant to the forum. I haven't been on _very_ long, but I haven't seen it. and for added kicks: ______________________________________________________ From Brandon's final chat Grooves: What do you think of Ethan and his hair? Survivor_Brandon: Jesus has risen and he walks among us and he plays Survivor. ______________________________________________________ Thanks, Eric
|
|
Top |
| |
|
Kokoro 3899 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Thong Contest Judge"
|
12-21-01, 02:03 PM (EST)
|
3. "RE: This is NOT a Spoiler..." |
LAST EDITED ON 12-21-01 AT 02:05 PM (EST)Not to mention that the Sun, which is basically the point of all the follow up posts ~does not~ only appear over Ethan (plus that "Star of David" has been in all 3 seasons; It's only a camera filter)....this guy reminds me of one of those religious fanatics that relates any and every current event with the book of Revelations. EDIT: I keep forgetting the damn t's ^-^;; ----------------------------------------
"Sometimes your shallowness is so thorough, it's almost like depth." - Daria
|
|
Top |
| |
|
red 140 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Blistex Spokesperson"
|
12-21-01, 02:18 PM (EST)
|
4. "RE: This is NOT a Spoiler..." |
Actually, I DON'T think the guy is a religious fanatic. He also came up with the "Dog That Didn't Bark" proof on why Tina's editing points to her as the winner. This is exactly the sort of analysis that people do with literature, films etc. Religious themes are often found everywhere - its a touchstone of literary criticism. And I DO think its possible that this sort of complexity goes into the editing - it would take Survivor to a new level in terms of reality television if Mark Burnett can not just entertain, but introduce complex themes in subtle manners. The guy is studying the editing and writing a thesis just as you might with THE GREAT GATSBY. Is he right? Well, unlike literary criticism, his thesis can ultimately be disproved. But it doesn't take away from its validity, in my mind, as a decent reading into themes. I do think that with each season, the quality of the show is improving (camera, editing etc.) Now, whether he's right or wrong, I cant' even begin to speculate. But actually, I do think this merits "spoiler" over "speculation" status. Its no different from the facetime theory - it's evidence that is found from studying the editing.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
Kokoro 3899 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Thong Contest Judge"
|
12-21-01, 02:55 PM (EST)
|
5. "RE: This is NOT a Spoiler..." |
(Erm, sorry if anyone's getting annoyed. I wasn't going for a debate.) I know who the guy is. My comment wasn't meant to be interpreted that he in particular is a religious fanatic (it was badly worded =), but that with this theory, he is basically grasping at straws. I ~don't~ think this deserves spoiler status. Then again, almost nothing does. You'll notice that most people call ideas posted here speculation or theories, and if there is some kind of spoiler from a media outlet, then speculation and theories are developed around that. If Ethan wins, I still won't consider this of any importance. Sure, there was an insane amount of time spent on developing this theory; and bravo to the author for the entertaining read, but honestly, none of this really stands out in the episode. And no, I don't expect clues to be obvious. However, soundclips/screen captures could be pulled out for ~any~ of the 6 left and an entire story could be developed around them in the same interpretive way. I just have to say to end this: I'm not trying to knock TW personally. He's very imaginative and puts a lot of work into his posts - not to mention this theory is a hell of a lot better than anything I could do. ---------------------------------------- "Sometimes your shallowness is so thorough, it's almost like depth." - Daria
|
|
Top |
| |
|
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
|
|