>Is the title, refering to an alliance between a male and
>female ("dinner and a movie")that ends in "betrayal" at TC? >Is the betrayal between the two RC Challenge winners
>that end up going into town for "dinner and a movie"
>and later end their relationship with betrayal?
This could be just about anyone -- Tom taking Teresa with him with Teresa backstabbing him at TC, Brandon and KimP, Ethan and MamaKim or Kelly before the female switches over, Lex and anyone he takes with him to advise "well the rest of us are going to take you out, sorry, so I wanted to bring you with me for your last bit of enjoyment. Bon Appetit!"
>Are her articles less valuable since her last one was pulled
>and they may now be subject to much greater scrutiny?
I have wondered about this very point... how much can we read into what she is saying knowing that a prior article was yanked? Is she being coached on what to say and what not to say?
My opinion on the issue discussed earlier in this thread... I believe that Alicia and/or Sue writes (or narrates with a CBS writer) their articles and then have it proofed by someone and that person would advise if one of the people they're talking about is gone so they can change that particular sentence if needed. "... and Teresa sides with so-and-so -- wait, you're telling me she's gone? Ok let's change it to 'Lex continues his witch hunt, blah blah' ..."
"Damn you, Carl, for leaving me here with a bunch of misfits."
Frank Garrison, Nov. 1/01