|
|
PLEASE NOTE: The Reality TV World Message Boards are filled with desperate
attention-seekers pretending to be one big happy PG/PG13-rated family. Don't
be fooled. Trying to get everyone to agree with you is like herding cats,
but intolerance for other viewpoints is NOT welcome and respect for other
posters IS required at all times. Jump in and play, and you'll soon find out
how easy it is to fit in, but save your drama for your mama. All members are
encouraged to read the
complete guidelines.
As entertainment critic Roger
Ebert once said, "If you disagree with something I write, tell me so, argue
with me, correct me--but don't tell me to shut up. That's not the American way."
|
|
"Can we get rid of the Yield?"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
donracefan 0 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "New Member"
|
05-05-06, 04:04 PM (EST)
|
6. "RE: Can we get rid of the Yield?" |
I like the yield in theory and I don't want to see it taken out. However, I am with you all that I don't think it should be on a non-elimination leg. Think about it...there's been a superleg, 2 non-eliminations, 2 yields, there will be 2 fast forwards, and 1 finale. If they space everything to where no 2 of these fall in the same night they almost have enough to give every episode a twist. In fact, they should think up another item or two so that they can add a unique twist to every leg. And while we're talking about the pointlessness of a yield on a non-elimination leg, can I just inject that I think it's just as much of a waste of a fast forward to have it on a leg where it doesn't affect the outcome either (other than who wins the sponsor prize). With one or more bunch points in every episode, it really doesn't matter who comes in first except that they are guaranteed not to be eliminated but if you have a non-elimination on a fast forward leg, it really takes away its worth. Any other thoughts on that??
|
|
Top |
| |
|
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
|
|