|
|
PLEASE NOTE: The Reality TV World Message Boards are filled with desperate
attention-seekers pretending to be one big happy PG/PG13-rated family. Don't
be fooled. Trying to get everyone to agree with you is like herding cats,
but intolerance for other viewpoints is NOT welcome and respect for other
posters IS required at all times. Jump in and play, and you'll soon find out
how easy it is to fit in, but save your drama for your mama. All members are
encouraged to read the
complete guidelines.
As entertainment critic Roger
Ebert once said, "If you disagree with something I write, tell me so, argue
with me, correct me--but don't tell me to shut up. That's not the American way."
|
|
"interesting spoiler from Super Bowl"
cabybake 3 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "American Cancer Society Spokesperson"
|
04-07-01, 09:19 PM (EST)
|
"interesting spoiler from Super Bowl" |
posted by SurvivorLDog93 at EZBoard SS.com Super Bowl Teaser -- Final 4 Spoiler -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Before you all torch my drawers for posting another "I know who the final 4 will be" thread, let me give credit where it's due. Amid all the spoilers and speculation I have read over and over again how MB said there would be "clues" in the S2 premiere ep (played on Super Bowl Sunday) which would lead us to the ultimate winner. Based on that, I set out on a rainy Saturday with a little extra time on my hands, intending to do a transcript of Ep 1. (That will take some time ... LOL!)Since I had taped the entire day, I decided to re-watch the last few minutes of Super Bowl XXXV, which my Baltimore Ravens won. Right after the end of the game, and right before the awarding of the Lombardi trophy, there is a SeeBS promo for the new show. (For those with tapes of the game, it shows at the bottom/left hand corner of the screen with a voice-over by a football announcer.) I think that little 10 second promo revealed to us on Super Bowl Sunday who the Final 4 would be. ****************************************************** SURVIVOR MUSIC BEGINS. Pic of 16 Survivors with plane. Koala. KEITH is shown standing between, and in front of, MadDog and Mitchell. ELISABETH is shown, crouching or kneeling. Kangaroo. Croc. COLBY is shown standing tall with his game face on. AMBER is shown from the shoulders up. Herd romps through the outback. VOICEOVER: All right coming up next on SeeBS, don't miss the premiere of this year's most talked about, most anticipated show. "Survivor: The Australian Outback" is coming up next. ******************************************************* This ten second teaser showed TWICE, five minutes apart. Did SeeBS show us the Final 4 in the Super Bowl teaser?? We were shown clear shots of KEITH, ELISABETH, COLBY and AMBER. Who'da thunk they'd give us 4 of the Final 6 in a ten second preview right after the game? Looks like a legit spoiler to me, at least in retrospect. Due to technical difficulties, this week's SURVIVOR has been pre-empted by a rerun of the PAGONG SHOW ... ******************************************* What do y'all think? Caby
|
|
Top |
| |
ACPS65 240 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Network TV Show Guest Star"
|
04-07-01, 11:13 PM (EST)
|
1. "RE: interesting spoiler from Super Bowl" |
I took a look at this the other day. I think it's defintley a possibility. This also ties into my theory about Liz winning. For those of you intrested, my theory looks at the following facts:-FACT: Jeff stated in an earlier episode Liz would win if she got in the final four. Is this another example of the Richard Hatch "Check in my hand" deal? -FACT: What you just mentioned. During the Super Bowl, 4 faces were shown of the 16 castaways. Keith, Colby, Amber, and Elisabeth Filarski. -FACT: Jeff Probst stated on a news magazine show that "Elisabeth kicks butt" . Seeing how she has yet to have won ANY Reward OR Immunity challenges, I believe we've yet to see this butt kicking. -FACT: Mark Burnett mentioned we'd be pleased with this season's winner. Although it's hard to decide on who we wouldn't be pleased at this point, I feel Liz is the most likable female. Of course, I could be wrong...I would just die if she went on Thursday....LOL But getting back to the Super Bowl, I think it could be "just another nail in the coffin", as Alicia might say.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
cowboyroo 590 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Reality Show Commentator"
|
04-07-01, 11:30 PM (EST)
|
2. "RE: interesting spoiler from Super Bowl" |
I think you're onto something here. I just looked back at my Us Magazine (Feb 5th issue) and came to the same conclusion:Front Cover: Mitchell, Amber, Elisabeth, Kel Mitchell and Kel first two males voted off the show. Elisabeth and Amber last two? Inside photos: 1st page: Profiles of Michael and Tina: Last to go before merger; last to go before Final 4? 2nd page: Profiles of Kel and Jerri: 1st Ogakor to go pre-merger, 1st Ogakor to go post-merger. 3rd page: Profiles of Debb and Jeff: 1st Kucha to go pre-merger, 1st Kucha to go post-merger. 4th page: Profiles of Kimmi and Alicia: 2nd Kucha to go pre-merger, 2nd Kucha to go post-merger. Seems very coincidental that there are these type of patterns, so with 6 left this would mean:
x, Tina, (x, x, x, x...Elisabeth and Amber Final 4 due to being last two females around) Then on the cover of the March 12th issue, there are photos of Elisabeth, Colby, Jeff and Alicia in that order. Could this be: 1st two to go post-merger, 1st two to go post-Final Four. Then we would have: x, Tina, Elisabeth, Colby, (Amber or x), (Amber or x) The only two left out are Keith and Rodger. With other spoilers out there, Rodger would be the most sensible to go next. Ogakor sticks together. Liz wins immunity. Rodger gone. This could make the injury per horse accident possible since MB said horses come to play this episode. I don't think he gets seriously hurt though. This would also explain Maralyn getting to know him as he is the only one of Maralyn's friends still around. Tina going next I had a hard time with at first, but if the remaining survivors are Tina, Elis, Colby, Amber, Keith; Colby who plays smart is going to want to off K or T in case they get to Final 3. Tina is also someone who has no votes (to this point at least) and has been, well Benedict-Tina. This would mean Elis probably won immunity again; possibly covering the kick-butt in challenges. Elisabeth next. Remaining Ogies stick together. Don't want to take a Kucha to Final 2 under any circumstances, especially Lis. This would cover Boston Globe Final 4 for Elisabeth as well, and notice they said Final 4, not Final 3, 2 or 1. Colby next. Most likely to win against jury. Keith or Amber winning immunity surely points to this. My guess is that Amber would beat Keith in a jury vote, especially since 1) Last episode Keith was started to be made out as a bad guy a few times, and 2) Jerri gets to have her "power in the jury" statement be made reality. Thoughts?
|
|
Top |
| |
|
cowboyroo 590 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Reality Show Commentator"
|
04-08-01, 00:31 AM (EST)
|
4. "RE: interesting spoiler from Super Bowl" |
IC..I think Keith would vote with Tina and Liz with C/A. Keith wouldn't do that to Tina after she jumped off for him. Wouldn't be a smart move. This could also explain Keith starting his book tour so early. Sell books before you're portrayed as the bad guy!
|
|
Top |
| |
|
|
bergdogg 380 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Cooking Show Host"
|
04-08-01, 00:55 AM (EST)
|
5. "RE: interesting spoiler from Super Bowl" |
okay, if this Spoiler is true, here is how I see things going:6th place: Rodger (cause lizzy won immunity) 5th place: Tina(Lizzy wins another immunity, and she gets Amber and prolly Colby to vote with her) 4th place: Keith (Liz wins immunity AGAIN, and the three get rid of the EVIL COOK) 3rd place: Colby (AMBER WINS IMMUNITY, but being the idiot that she is, she picks to go up against her new friend over the guy she SHOULD go against) 2nd place: unknown THE MILLIONARE: unknown obviously, I cauld, AND PROLLY will be wrong, but it is a STRONG possibility.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
|
|
Lurking 156 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Blistex Spokesperson"
|
04-08-01, 01:47 PM (EST)
|
9. "RE: this spoiler and the source code theory." |
I have little or no idea what attitude we're supposed to have towards Keith.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
|
|