|
|
PLEASE NOTE: The Reality TV World Message Boards are filled with desperate
attention-seekers pretending to be one big happy PG/PG13-rated family. Don't
be fooled. Trying to get everyone to agree with you is like herding cats,
but intolerance for other viewpoints is NOT welcome and respect for other
posters IS required at all times. Jump in and play, and you'll soon find out
how easy it is to fit in, but save your drama for your mama. All members are
encouraged to read the
complete guidelines.
As entertainment critic Roger
Ebert once said, "If you disagree with something I write, tell me so, argue
with me, correct me--but don't tell me to shut up. That's not the American way."
|
|
"Jerri Interview Spoiler?"
LIZZLOVER 235 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Network TV Show Guest Star"
|
04-03-01, 09:22 PM (EST)
|
"Jerri Interview Spoiler?" |
Don't know what to think of this, but thought I'd throw it out there anyway. It's an article about Jerri "slipping up" but I don't know what interview this happened in, if at all. "Now it looks as though Jerri has made a slip of the tongue as well. Jerri said that in the final tribal council she would have a lot to say to Tina. Note though that she's not saying she WILL say something because that has already happened. She's already said it. But she can only say something about Tina if Tina is in the final 2. That's enough for me. Tina is in but will the final episode of Survivor 2 feature another rat and snake speech from Jerri? " Here's the link to the article http://www.3bigshows.com/survivorii-hath.shtml Lizz Just Is
|
|
Top |
| |
AyatollahKhomeini 2008 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Roller Coaster Inaugurator"
|
04-03-01, 09:27 PM (EST)
|
1. "BillPosters" |
The article referenced in this link was written by BillPosters, who was a valuable member of ss.com in tracing down pre-show info. But ... has anyone seen this actual quote in Jerri's interviews?
|
|
Top |
| |
|
|
ItzLisa 3350 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Car Show Celebrity"
|
04-04-01, 11:30 AM (EST)
|
3. "RE: Jerri Interview Spoiler?" |
LAST EDITED ON 04-04-01 AT 11:33 AM (EST)Ever since Shakes posted the People Magazine article with that possible slip up from Tina's husband, I can't help but be convniced Tina's in the final two. This article makes me even more convinced. I'd love to see the actual quote too, but it wouldn't surprise me a bit - Jerri would love to give another Susan Hawk speech to Tina (although I don't understand WHY she's singling out Tina - everyone voted for Jerri but Amber! They all orchestrated it, Tina was just one in six, Jerri baby!!). Look at it purely from the point of view of Jerri's huge, enormous ego (which is almost as big as her mouth!). She won't be the center of attention anymore till the final episode. For someone like her, that's too long out of the spotlight - she'll be desperate to make up for it when the jury makes their final comments. Now, it could be any of them in the final two she could make that speech to - Colby, Keith - hell, Elisabeth did a lot of campaign work to the Ogas for that matter. But Jerri singles out TINA in this interview? That says to me Tina's in the final two and Jerri dropped her little hint as a further attention getting ploy - her big speech will be the next one. ************************************** What if the Hokey Pokey really IS what it's all about???
|
|
Top |
| |
|
samiam 5976 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"
|
04-04-01, 12:53 PM (EST)
|
4. "RE: Jerri Interview Spoiler?" |
I remember her making the comment on the Early Show that she didn't mind being kicked off, because that meant she was on the jury, "And the jury is a VERY POWERFUL place to be." Just the way she said it made me think that she enjoyed that exercise of power in a very specific way...like a Sue/Kelly type speech (look for it to begin, "Out, out damned spot!")
|
|
Top |
| |
|
Loree 8616 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"
|
04-04-01, 02:25 PM (EST)
|
6. "RE: Jerri Interview Spoiler?" |
Jerri is back on The Early Show tomorrow morning to chat with Bryant. Maybe he will get some information out of her. They will show another preview then too.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
Loree 8616 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"
|
04-04-01, 03:17 PM (EST)
|
8. "bump" |
One more bump to move THAT post to the next page.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
Outfrontgirl 6830 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"
|
04-04-01, 02:33 PM (EST)
|
7. "RE: Jerri Interview Spoiler?" |
I didn't hear anything very interesting on Letterman; Early Show and Rosie were a bit better. Because Dave appears to know nothing and care less about the show, he tends not to ask apoiler-helpful questions. Instead he asks things like why the Survivors don't just hike over to the crew compound if they're hungry.Jerri keeps saying she got kicked out for being too honest (same on Rosie). I guess that's her story and she's sticking to it. She did tell Dave that there was a lot of backstabbing and he asked then if being a backstabber was the way to win, at which she laughed and agreed. Nothing so specific or helpful as looking angry, as if a backstabber (Tina, Tina) actually did win--but then, supposedly Jerri doesn't know which of the F2 won. On Rosie, the jury question again made Jerri rub her hands together and cackle. The question is whether she truly got to influence the outcome or if that's simply the only position she can take at present in order to counterbalance the fact she lost. Alicia also took refuge in jury status, a natural move. That said, I can definitely see Jerri revelling in getting to make a speech. Given that she was still apparently clueless about how much she was hated, she may not have realized that her "power" lay in making people do the opposite. I think she would love to get back at Tina (judged her as backstabber from time of breaking with her alliance and voting out Mitchell, per Early Show) or Keith, whom she plain disliked and blamed for her ouster. One can tell from the interviews that Jerri did have a crush on Colby and was still clueless about all the derogatory comments he made about her until she saw the show. She seems to have been in denial that Colby played a major part in her ousting. In fact, Jeff P didn't read the 8th vote, so someone clinging to denial could believe the unread vote was Colby's for Lis. Jerri told Rosie she recently met Colby at a premiere for first time since show ended. Jerri has said nothing on these 3 shows about hanging out with Colby on the ranch, even though she seemed to be grabbing at every reason to say that, outside of the game, Colby liked her, he really liked her. I'm thinking either Colby practiced estrogen avoidance at the ranch or he got there late--probably the former. At time of jury voting, she probably wasn't on a vendetta against Colby, but I doubt he's in Final 2, so that was probably a moot point. As for Elisabeth or Rodger, I don't see that Jerri has negative feelings towards any Kucha. They did nothing but compete and earn her respect. Also, Amber never betrayed her. In sum, Jerri's issues are against Keith and Tina only. Jerri's jury position would not make her feel extremely powerful if she could only offer support of Amber. Power lies in working against an enemy. Best of all worlds to Jerri: Amber against Keith or Tina. Looking back at the spoiler about gifts for Jerri's Mom: I would bet now that Mom is to open them while watching Jerri's jury performance. I always considered that to be as much a possibility as that Jerri was in Final Two. Literary ref: "Out damned spot" is good. I didn't know until Rosie that Jerri's current play title refers to Lady Macbeth. Is that her role? That would be perfect. Two more apt quotes from Lady M: "What hath quenched them hath given me fire. Hark!" "What need we fear who knows it, when none can call our power to account?"
|
|
Top |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Outfrontgirl 6830 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"
|
04-04-01, 03:59 PM (EST)
|
11. "RE: Jerri Interview Spoiler?" |
Thanks, I'll be looking forward to the match up! So far, everyone but Rosie has kissed her ass and said she was actually a nice person. Rosie told her she was mean and bitchy but that was OK. I hope Bryant doesn't cave as well. I didn't hate Jerri as much as most people (because I thought she added entertainment) but her interviews show how completely self-centered she was and is. Still hoping for a juicy spoiler to slip out as she focuses on nothing but damage control to her image...
|
|
Top |
| |
|
|
SurvivinDawg 6816 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"
|
04-04-01, 07:18 PM (EST)
|
13. "Pouring gasoline on the fire...." |
On her interview with Rich Hatch on etonline.com, Hatch asked Jerri who she (Jerri) would least likely have future contact with. I would interpret this question to essentially mean "Who do you hate most, Jerri?"Jerri's answer was Keith. She said something about wishing she could sample a Keith Famie gourmet meal, but that they were just not compatible in personalities. Admittedly Jerri and Keith did not like each other, but Jerri did apologize to Keith (as we saw in the recap episode) and, quite frankly, Keith was a follower, not a leader in getting Jerri ousted. Also, Keith voted for Mitchell in the Mad Dog TC, not Jerri, and if Jerri didn't know that before, she could have logged onto survivor.cbs.com and seen it long before now! Now the interesting thing to me about this, vis-a-vis all the discussion on this thread, is that if Jerri really hated Tina that much, why not say to Hatch that she wouldn't have contact with Tina OR say in the same breath that she wouldn't have contact with either Keith or Tina? Also, Jerri doesn't mention Amber AT ALL, if I'm reading all this correctly. I cannot believe that if Jerri and Amber were still friends that Jerri wouldn't mention her, and if Jerri and Amber had had a falling out that Jerri wouldn't mention THAT! So I'm really suspecting that Amber is not being mentioned because MB has admonished the contestants not to discuss Amber or Lis (and IMHO that is because Amber and Lis are the Final Two. Who needs any Source Code Theory? ) Anyway, it's all gravy.... *** Contradictions don't exist. If you are faced with a contradiction, check your premises. You will find that one of them is wrong. -- Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged "If I were perfect, I'd run for God." -- Corporal Maxwell Q. Klinger, 4077th MASH
|
|
Top |
| |
|
|
|
shakes the clown 3366 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Car Show Celebrity"
|
04-05-01, 00:55 AM (EST)
|
15. "RE: Pouring gasoline on the fire...." |
>BTW - she interviewed on Howard >Stern too... but since he >spent most of the time >trying to get her to >take her clothes off it >wasn't much of an interview... >(she didn't in case your >wondering... and for a $10,000 >no less...) ...I was wondering if anyone else wasted 30 minutes listening to that crap besides me! Everytime he would bring up somehthing interesting like what she thought of Alicia or Lamber, the subject would immmediately shift to "taking off clothes" begging by Stern and his cohorts.
Complete waste of time.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
Outfrontgirl 6830 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"
|
04-05-01, 02:00 AM (EST)
|
16. "RE: Pouring gasoline on the fire...." |
Thanks, S. Dawg for the pointer. I read the Hatch interview. Omission of Amber is striking. I agree that if they're still in touch, Jerri should have included her with Mitchell and Alicia. I question, though, the admonishment by Burnett theory? Why? Omissions where the public expects a reference would foreseeably raise Amber's profile rather than the reverse. I also find it hard to imagine that Amber did something specific to offend Jerri later on in the game, other than possibly to stay in the game and WIN. I mean, this game was supposed to be about Jerri, and these interviews are about the great and wonderful Jerri, not little sidekicks who flew under the radar. It's also possible that Amber made a good lapdog/ally but didn't really have the kind of sharp, snappy "hip" personality that Jerri prefers for company in the real world. I'm struck in Jerri's interviews by her emphasis on personality: Jerri let personality conflicts and attractions affect the way she played the game. She seems to view the game as one arena, in which tactics are tactics, and this she can get over. As in-- Tina was a player, cause neither for endearment nor hate. Keith, however, tried to impose his ways of managing daily life at the camp away from a control freak; his personality and hers have been proven incompatible, therefore, no future relationship (reminiscent of the Alicia/Kimmi bad feelings). I'm trying to propose that, to Jerri, her present relationships are largely based on whether she really enjoys their company and thinks they have future interests in common, rather than on their game strategy. This is the person who announced at TC who her friends were, with no cautionary pause between brain and lip. It's quite likely her response to Richard is just as genuine-- Mitchell and Alicia are the two she hangs out with. "Was there somebody else I should have thanked? Amber? Oh, yeah, we hung out and she was the only one who appreciated my chocolate fantasies, but she's young and doesn't hang out with media whores or aspire to a career in show business. Sorry, it's been awhile and she didn't pop into my mind. She's so Beaver, Pennsylvania and I'm so L.A/New York. (Besides which, she may have won even though it should have been me up there with Colby, so I haven't really felt like reaching out, ya know?) That said, I'm thinking that Jerri and Amber didn't solidify their friendship by spending time together at the ranch. My theory is that Jerri and Alicia are the only two girls on the jury/at the ranch for at least two more episodes, probably three. The Colby/Nick spoiler (whatever it's authenticity) seems to state that the pre-jury bootees stayed somewhere else (resort or travel). Thus, Jeff and Kimmi and Mitchell aren't with Alicia and Jerri, so the two bond. This arrangement makes sense to me, as the jury would not be influenced by or confer with the earlier bootees, and the Burnett sense of hierarchy would be underscored by the sequestration. It would also mean that the jury would be all Barramundi and have far more opportunity to bond for individual reasons rather than former tribe membership, which might help break down tribal loyalties for the final vote. (The theory of separation of early bootees and jury does fail to account for why Maralyn includes Rodger with her friends.) Does anyone have the straight story on whether the 2 groups stayed in separate facilities? To Shakes: Yeah, sorry you had to waste your time. Stern's show seems to aim for and achieve unrelenting obnoxiousness along lines that might possibly entertain the lowest common denominator in junior high school at best.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
|
|
Outfrontgirl 6830 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"
|
04-05-01, 01:45 PM (EST)
|
18. "RE: Pouring gasoline on the fire...." |
Wendy, I totally agree with all except I don't think it could be Lis. When Jerri voted for her, she called her the most likeable, etc. person she knew and was eliminating her as a threat only. No personal animosity, which Jerri never would have bothered to hide. Keith or Tina.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
|
|