PLEASE NOTE: The Reality TV World Message Boards are filled with desperate
attention-seekers pretending to be one big happy PG/PG13-rated family. Don't
be fooled. Trying to get everyone to agree with you is like herding cats,
but intolerance for other viewpoints is NOT welcome and respect for other
posters IS required at all times. Jump in and play, and you'll soon find out
how easy it is to fit in, but save your drama for your mama. All members are
encouraged to read the
complete guidelines.
As entertainment critic Roger
Ebert once said, "If you disagree with something I write, tell me so, argue
with me, correct me--but don't tell me to shut up. That's not the American way."
shakes the clown 3366 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Car Show Celebrity"
09-08-06, 12:04 PM (EST)
128. "RE: B.B.A.Stards Episode #27 East C..."
>I don't really understand how it >is that Erika played Janelle. >We all knew that Janelle >was toast if she didn't >win HOH. Not a single >one of them had planned >to take Janelle to the >final 2. She evicted Will >because she thought (and I >think she was right) she >had a better chance of >making it with Erika. Janelle >is not sitting in sequester >because she got played by >Erika. She got evicted because >she did not win the >HOH when she needed it >the most.
..of course she got played by Erika. IF Erika wasn't in the house janelle would've had a much better chance of winning the final HOH challenge and since you yourself even say that she needed to win that challenge to stay in the game how can you then say she wasn't played by Erika when it was Erika who convinced her to evict Will????
And to top it off, Janelle believed Erika when she said that she would take her to the F2 which had a lot to do with evicting Will...and we all know that Erika was just PLAYING Janelle when she said that and had no intention of honoring that promise.
So, how is that NOT playing someone?
If it was Janelle vs CT in the final HOH she would've been a huge favorite to win the endurance portion as opposed to being a huge underdog against Erika. And since you even acknowledge she needed to win that challenge I don't see how you can then say she wasn't played by Erika since E got her to do something that negatively affected her chances in the game. That's the textbook defnition of being played.
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -