The Amazing Race   American Idol   The Apprentice   The Bachelor   The Bachelorette   Big Brother   The Biggest Loser
Dancing with the Stars   So You Think You Can Dance   Survivor   Top Model   The Voice   The X Factor       Reality TV World
   
Stop WAR in Ukraine ! http://twitter.com/@euromaidan
PLEASE NOTE: The Reality TV World Message Boards are filled with desperate attention-seekers pretending to be one big happy PG/PG13-rated family. Don't be fooled. Trying to get everyone to agree with you is like herding cats, but intolerance for other viewpoints is NOT welcome and respect for other posters IS required at all times. Jump in and play, and you'll soon find out how easy it is to fit in, but save your drama for your mama. All members are encouraged to read the complete guidelines. As entertainment critic Roger Ebert once said, "If you disagree with something I write, tell me so, argue with me, correct me--but don't tell me to shut up. That's not the American way."
"WHY the Video news NOW???"
Email this topic to a friend
Printer-friendly version of this topic
Bookmark this topic (Registered users only)
Archived thread - Read only 
Previous Topic | Next Topic 
Conferences Survivor Spoilers Forum (Protected)
Original message

SurvivinDawg 6816 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"

03-23-01, 05:50 PM (EST)
Click to EMail SurvivinDawg Click to send private message to SurvivinDawg Click to view user profile Click to check IP address of the poster
"WHY the Video news NOW???"
Okay, I don't want to talk about the XXX Video with Colby and Jerri itself, nor if it's real or not, etc. But the fact that it was on some radio stations means that it *IS* news. What I want to discuss is the TIMING of the release of this information, to wit:

WHY did this news come out NOW? Just before E9? Here are some ideas I have had, for you to dissect like so many things that Michael ate unnecessarily:

Reward challenge related:
1) Colby and Jerri win the RC. Will there be any romantic interest during their Reward?
2) Reward Challenge: Colby and AMBER go on the Reward. Jerri gets jealous. We spoilers ask "Does this mean there's a Colby/Amber video? A Jerri/Amber catfight video?"

Jerri voted off related:
3) Colby is going to participate in the planning and execution of the voting off of Jerri. This story is a red herring designed to get us thinking exactly the other way (how much more "other way" could it be? )
4) It generates that little bit more publicity for and about Jerri before she gets waxed.

Other
5) ??? Y'all tell me.

*** Contradictions don't exist. If you are faced with a contradiction, check your premises. You will find that one of them is wrong. -- Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged

  Top

  Table of Contents

  Subject     Author     Message Date     ID  
 RE: WHY the Video news NOW??? Dreamingofcolleen 03-23-01 1
   RE: WHY the Video news NOW??? SurvivinDawg 03-23-01 2
 RE: WHY the Video news NOW??? my0wn 03-23-01 3
 RE: WHY the Video news NOW??? spoilsport 03-23-01 4
 RE: WHY the Video news NOW??? Dalton 03-24-01 5
   RE: WHY the Video news NOW??? SurvivinDawg 03-24-01 6

Lobby | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic

Messages in this topic

Dreamingofcolleen 73 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Hollywood Squares Square"

03-23-01, 06:37 PM (EST)
Click to EMail Dreamingofcolleen Click to send private message to Dreamingofcolleen Click to check IP address of the poster
1. "RE: WHY the Video news NOW???"
There is a porno of Colby and Jerri. Thats news to me.
  Top

SurvivinDawg 6816 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"

03-23-01, 06:50 PM (EST)
Click to EMail SurvivinDawg Click to send private message to SurvivinDawg Click to view user profile Click to check IP address of the poster
2. "RE: WHY the Video news NOW???"
Once again, I don't want this thread to be about the video or its existence. I'm asking about the TIMING of the RELEASE of the NEWS about it.

*** Contradictions don't exist. If you are faced with a contradiction, check your premises. You will find that one of them is wrong. -- Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged

  Top

my0wn 40 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Beauty Pageant Celebrity Judge"

03-23-01, 11:11 PM (EST)
Click to EMail my0wn Click to send private message to my0wn Click to view user profile Click to check IP address of the poster
3. "RE: WHY the Video news NOW???"
Could MB be trying to convert our attention away from the Kucha demise in 9, 10, and 11?
  Top

spoilsport 9 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "American Cancer Society Spokesperson"

03-23-01, 11:31 PM (EST)
Click to EMail spoilsport Click to send private message to spoilsport Click to view user profile Click to check IP address of the poster
4. "RE: WHY the Video news NOW???"
Probably to sustain audience interest in Survivor, as this is the part of the show where it gets methodical. The question is: when is the video gonna be posted on the Internet?!?! And I DO wonder when exactly Colby and Jerri did that...pre-merger? Post-merger? Or maybe it doesn't matter because it won't affect Colby's vote anyway because it's just sex? It's interesting to note how Jerri, Colby, and Amber are pretty much mum now. I mean, Keith, Tina, Lis, Rodger...they're getting some publicity as to their present lives. In my opinion, Jerri the ##### and Colby the airhead deserve each other. (well ok, Colby's not as bad as Jerri, although he should be "grateful he's alive and has a head bigger than Texas")
  Top

Dalton 1271 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Beef Jerky Spokesperson"

03-24-01, 00:58 AM (EST)
Click to EMail Dalton Click to send private message to Dalton Click to view user profile Click to check IP address of the poster
5. "RE: WHY the Video news NOW???"
>Okay, I don't want to talk
>about the XXX Video with
>Colby and Jerri itself, nor
>if it's real or not,
>etc. But the fact
>that it was on some
>radio stations means that it
>*IS* news.

NO DAWG,
*it*, meaning any...."XXX video"....
was NOT...."on some radio stations".
Try to get a few facts first.

If you even BOTHERED to read the SB Basher Board,
you would find that we have discussed this topic
already (15 posts?). The two URL's to the specific
radio shows in question....
(again: posted on the Basher Board---not HERE or by YOU)
are simply claiming that "some MB camera or crew person
is peddling a 3rd generation copy of a tape of
something sexual between C/J."

OH yeah DAWG, that makes it a FACT; that makes it NEWS!
That makes its "TIMING" so important!! Pardon me while
I die laughing!!!!

Somebody might even believe you when you start a
NEW Spoiler Thread with nothing more than some cheap
third-hand piece of Hollywood gossip......that you
obviously don't even know what you are talking about.

All the while you start off excusing youself (in advance)
by protesting......
"I don't want to talk about it...or whether it
is real or not".

Since "semantics" (def: loosely, verbal trickery) is one
of your favored comebacks....I ask you WHY you want to
talk about the "TIMING" of something doesn't even
exist???

As for your sig line: to-wit:
"*** Contradictions don't exist." OH Yes DAWG---they DO exist!! Proof being that you are still posting @SB.com.

Dalton


  Top

SurvivinDawg 6816 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"

03-24-01, 01:24 PM (EST)
Click to EMail SurvivinDawg Click to send private message to SurvivinDawg Click to view user profile Click to check IP address of the poster
6. "RE: WHY the Video news NOW???"
I don't know what your problem is, Dalton, but it is clear that your message was a personal attack upon me and disregarded facts and made up stuff in order to continue that attack upon me. Let's just examine this:

>NO DAWG,
>*it*, meaning any...."XXX video"....
>was NOT...."on some radio stations".
>Try to get a few facts
>first.

I obviously meant that the news about it was on some radio stations. Besides, anyone like you who would take it literally that a *VIDEO* is on the *RADIO* has been smoking KuchaKorn.

>If you even BOTHERED to read
>the SB Basher Board,

No I do not bother to read the Basher Board. I was reading THIS board.

>you would find that we have
>discussed this topic
>already (15 posts?).

So what? I wanted to post to THIS board, as the content of my message pertained to SPOILER VALUE of the TIMING of the NEWS RELEASE. Since you clearly live in the Basher Board world and seem much happier there, feel free to stay over there.

>OH yeah DAWG, that makes it
>a FACT; that makes it
>NEWS!
>That makes its "TIMING" so
>important!! Pardon me while
>I die laughing!!!!

We can only hope that your laughter will cause the result you mention. I do think the TIMING of the news is important, although it may or may not have spoiler value.

>Somebody might even believe you when
>you start a
>NEW Spoiler Thread with nothing more
>than some cheap
>third-hand piece of Hollywood gossip......that you
>obviously don't even know what you
>are talking about.

Spoiler threads have been started and continued for much less.

>All the while you start off
>excusing youself (in advance)
>by protesting......
>"I don't want to talk about
>it...or whether it
>is real or not".

Since you clearly do not possess the intelligence to understand what I said the first time, let me try to say it in words that even you will understand: I didn't want to talk about the Video itself. I did not want to talk about whether or not it was true that such a video existed. I DID (and DO) want to talk about the TIMING of the RELEASE of the NEWS about it. Now if you don't understand that, I can't help you further. Perhaps you will find assistance in your basher-board world.

>Since "semantics" (def: loosely, verbal trickery)
>is one
>of your favored comebacks....I ask you
>WHY you want to
>talk about the "TIMING" of something
>doesn't even
>exist???

First, as was easily predictable, your definition of semantics is totally wrong. Second, whether or not the video exists was not the topic (oh, but that's right, you didn't comprehend that the first several times I said it). Third, the NEWS about it certainly does exist, but we wouldn't expect you to have YOUR facts straight despite you bashing me for supposedly the same crime.

>As for your sig line: to-wit:
>
>"*** Contradictions don't exist." OH
>Yes DAWG---they DO exist!!
>Proof being that you are
>still posting @SB.com.

And how is that a contradiction? I could make my sig. line "Better for Dalton to be silent and merely be thought a fool than have him post and remove all doubt." But no, I won't change my sig line.

*** Contradictions don't exist. If you are faced with a contradiction, check your premises. You will find that one of them is wrong. -- Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged

  Top


Remove

Lobby | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic

p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
about this site   •   advertise on this site  •   contact us  •   privacy policy   •