I don't know what your problem is, Dalton, but it is clear that your message was a personal attack upon me and disregarded facts and made up stuff in order to continue that attack upon me. Let's just examine this:
>*it*, meaning any...."XXX video"....
>was NOT...."on some radio stations".
>Try to get a few facts
I obviously meant that the news about it was on some radio stations. Besides, anyone like you who would take it literally that a *VIDEO* is on the *RADIO* has been smoking KuchaKorn.
>If you even BOTHERED to read
>the SB Basher Board,
No I do not bother to read the Basher Board. I was reading THIS board.
>you would find that we have
>discussed this topic
>already (15 posts?).
So what? I wanted to post to THIS board, as the content of my message pertained to SPOILER VALUE of the TIMING of the NEWS RELEASE. Since you clearly live in the Basher Board world and seem much happier there, feel free to stay over there.
>OH yeah DAWG, that makes it
>a FACT; that makes it
>That makes its "TIMING" so
>important!! Pardon me while
>I die laughing!!!!
We can only hope that your laughter will cause the result you mention. I do think the TIMING of the news is important, although it may or may not have spoiler value.
>Somebody might even believe you when
>you start a
>NEW Spoiler Thread with nothing more
>than some cheap
>third-hand piece of Hollywood gossip......that you
>obviously don't even know what you
>are talking about.
Spoiler threads have been started and continued for much less.
>All the while you start off
>excusing youself (in advance)
>"I don't want to talk about
>it...or whether it
>is real or not".
Since you clearly do not possess the intelligence to understand what I said the first time, let me try to say it in words that even you will understand: I didn't want to talk about the Video itself. I did not want to talk about whether or not it was true that such a video existed. I DID (and DO) want to talk about the TIMING of the RELEASE of the NEWS about it. Now if you don't understand that, I can't help you further. Perhaps you will find assistance in your basher-board world.
>Since "semantics" (def: loosely, verbal trickery)
>of your favored comebacks....I ask you
>WHY you want to
>talk about the "TIMING" of something
First, as was easily predictable, your definition of semantics is totally wrong. Second, whether or not the video exists was not the topic (oh, but that's right, you didn't comprehend that the first several times I said it). Third, the NEWS about it certainly does exist, but we wouldn't expect you to have YOUR facts straight despite you bashing me for supposedly the same crime.
>As for your sig line: to-wit:
>"*** Contradictions don't exist." OH
>Yes DAWG---they DO exist!!
>Proof being that you are
>still posting @SB.com.
And how is that a contradiction? I could make my sig. line "Better for Dalton to be silent and merely be thought a fool than have him post and remove all doubt." But no, I won't change my sig line.
*** Contradictions don't exist. If you are faced with a contradiction, check your premises. You will find that one of them is wrong. -- Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged