|
|
PLEASE NOTE: The Reality TV World Message Boards are filled with desperate
attention-seekers pretending to be one big happy PG/PG13-rated family. Don't
be fooled. Trying to get everyone to agree with you is like herding cats,
but intolerance for other viewpoints is NOT welcome and respect for other
posters IS required at all times. Jump in and play, and you'll soon find out
how easy it is to fit in, but save your drama for your mama. All members are
encouraged to read the
complete guidelines.
As entertainment critic Roger
Ebert once said, "If you disagree with something I write, tell me so, argue
with me, correct me--but don't tell me to shut up. That's not the American way."
|
|
"You Don't Need This Competition Anymore"
okaychatt 2810 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Howard Stern Show Guest"
|
05-23-04, 04:52 PM (EST)
|
1. "RE: You Don't Need This Competition Anymore" |
"i hope i followed all of the guidelines. wish me luck "LOL!! I think you did just fine. I think Simon was conjecturing that Fantasia may not have the votes to win and was trying to reassure and console her. I don't see it as a knock on AI. Somewhere towards the beginning of the competition, the judges told Fantasia that she didn't need the AI title to have a career in music. The others, they said, did need the title to give them the boost. I think Fantasia has stood out as an individual from the beginning. She deserves the title, but I won't cry, "Foul!" if Diana wins. She certainly has talent, but she needs to work on voice control in the lower registers and when softness is required. Fantasia has been ready since the beginning. Her performances have been consistent and strong, with a only a song or two slightly off. She sings to the depth of her music, rather than just performs.
|
|
Top |
| |
AyaK 10426 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"
|
05-24-04, 08:56 PM (EST)
|
5. "Completely agree" |
...although perhaps -- since Jasmine seemed to be bulletproof -- the judges were trying to head off yet another torrent of criticism. That's the only polite explanation that I can think of for this comment.
|
|
Top |
| |
|
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
|
|