|
|
PLEASE NOTE: The Reality TV World Message Boards are filled with desperate
attention-seekers pretending to be one big happy PG/PG13-rated family. Don't
be fooled. Trying to get everyone to agree with you is like herding cats,
but intolerance for other viewpoints is NOT welcome and respect for other
posters IS required at all times. Jump in and play, and you'll soon find out
how easy it is to fit in, but save your drama for your mama. All members are
encouraged to read the
complete guidelines.
As entertainment critic Roger
Ebert once said, "If you disagree with something I write, tell me so, argue
with me, correct me--but don't tell me to shut up. That's not the American way."
|
|
"August 31 - Two Eviction Episode - ..."
davwav02 401 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Daytime Soap Guest Star"
|
08-24-06, 11:14 PM (EST)
|
"August 31 - Two Eviction Episode - ..." |
LAST EDITED ON 08-24-06 AT 11:19 PM (EST)Well, as usual, we didn't get much detail regarding the so-called twist for next week. My first thought when she said that Thursday would be a two eviction episode was that they would:
- Evict a houseguest, like normal
- Hold an HOH comp, like normal
- Immediately request nominations from the HOH (similar to a double eviction)
- Immmediately ask the houseguests to vote on the nominees, with no time for scheming (similar to if the Coup d'Etat had been used)
All of this would occur live, and no Veto would be involved. I could be wrong, or it could just be wishful thinking, but I find that to be an ideal situation to completely blindside the entire household, as she described.But since other factors come into play, such as the arguement that the producers try to manipulate the game, and this setup would entirely put the power in the hands of the houseguest who wins HOH, and would not have time to be adjusted and thus could realistically result in just about anyone's eviction, it may not be the ideal choice for the producers.
|
Alert |
Edit |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
| |
|
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
|
|