PLEASE NOTE: The Reality TV World Message Boards are filled with desperate
attention-seekers pretending to be one big happy PG/PG13-rated family. Don't
be fooled. Trying to get everyone to agree with you is like herding cats,
but intolerance for other viewpoints is NOT welcome and respect for other
posters IS required at all times. Jump in and play, and you'll soon find out
how easy it is to fit in, but save your drama for your mama. All members are
encouraged to read the
complete guidelines.
As entertainment critic Roger
Ebert once said, "If you disagree with something I write, tell me so, argue
with me, correct me--but don't tell me to shut up. That's not the American way."
>We've been given small hints all >along that Amber would screw >Rob in the end. >What if that's the misdirection? > On one side, you >see Rob profess his loyalty >to her, and on the >other, you hear Amber ready >to flip flop at any >moment. Even Rob had >to talk her out of >flipping a couple of times. > Maybe the hints are >supposed to make us think >Amber dumps him, when in >fact, she's the one who >stays loyal in the end?
I don't know... you make good arguments, True, but I'm really on the fence on this editing bit. I don't see why MB would just put all these editing bits in just for the purpose of making us think that Lamber won't go against Rawb at some point, unless that is what happens?
There is a recurring theme that I've noticed in the editing between Rawb and Lamber -- it seems that every time they sit down just holding each other or by each other, we'd see Rawb looking at her and Lamber would be gazing off into the horizon instead of looking at Rawb. Plus all of the confessional bits we've seen where Rawb says "well, if she votes against me, more power to her and she got me" and Lamber saying "he trusts me completely, heheh."
I'm almost convinced that Lamber WILL go against Rawb at some point (F3 vote?) based on the editing. But it's EPMB who is doing the editing, so...
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -