Well Loree, color me surprised. I really didn't think that Wanda was going anywhere. Looks like suddenly the tables have turned and Jim and Flor are now operating from the minority position. Wanda seemed their strongest ally, with some of the others, Matt (? -- ya know, it's sad, but even this far into the game I still have trouble remembering some of these folks names -- more dynamic casting is definitely needed) and John for example, being less closely allied.
Me thinks that the whole Flor and the Jimbots group were not as tight as they have been edited to appear if the budding relationship of the two single parents could have upset the whole applecart. Either that or Wanda was waaaay more annoying than what we've been allowed to see.
I really wished that they showed the votes too. I can't think of any reason for them not doing so, especially since it robs the viewers of the fun of seeing which folks flipped on their original "alliance". If that guy who wants to give the house away (Matt?) that Flor and the Jimbots saved the other week was one of the folks that flipped, then there is a whole new set of sub-alliances at work that we haven't been allowed to see.
As far as the condom usage, it really would appear to be Flor and Jim. They seem to spend more time than anyone in the "Love Shack". Heck, at the close of this week's show, they were the only two folks spending the night there. To me an equally big question is why whoever it is would just be dropping the wrappers around camp? Either someone has absolutely no discretion *or* someone is planting evidence to make others (Flor and Jim) look bad. Hmmmm....
I sure agree on remembering the names. I still am not sure of a couple of their names. I would not put it past Flor to have planted the condom wrapper just to screw up Jim's marriage. She is so manipulative it would not surprise me.
I think Wanda was just too bossy. They kept mentioning this and now they had an opportunity to get rid of her and take the power away from Jim & Flor who seemed to rule that group of 6.
I really think they make a big mistake by not showing us who votes for who. It would make us more interested in the alliances and let us know who is wavering and can be persuaded to change their vote.