The "originals" started out looking really great, everybody was lovey dovey. Well except for Zack and Amy, and shortly Bo and Alex, and well actually, hardly any of them were REALLY very nice even from day one. They just disguised their meanness pretty well while they all still felt safe and in control. Zack went out of his way on the very first day to show his disgust he'd been stuck with Amy. She went ahead and screwed him the first night anyway. I guess to show him that being stuck with her wouldn't be all bad. They acted nice (mostly) all the way up to the point when they realized the tide had turned (amy was too stupid to realize and thought her clique was still running things) which was when Keith, the man, sent boy Zack packing. (consider the difference in behavior Keith showed when bugeye toni tried her crap on him and when she did it to bo, I was surprised bo didn't cry.) Brain dead Amy, who was too stupid to realize the originals no longer ran things shows that group conscience, and their malicious character, when she vows to Keith she'll have him banned.
The "originals" were deceitful, SELF-deceived, malicious, but lacking in smarts. They were all childish, immature, and self-absorbed which was why they ultimately failed to garner Scott as an ally. I believe Scott would have allied with them over Keith and Dave, had they not behaved like a bunch of rabid juvenile delinquents.
What gagged me the most about their behavior, besides their outright and blatant hypocrisy, was their constant assertion they "deserved" to win. They finally come up with a reason, cause they've been there the longest. Oh yeah, and how did that happen? Oh yeah, they booted off other folk (those must NOT have "deserved" to win). Once they are no longer the majority, but actually are still on even footing with the fab 4 (yay), their true ugly personalities come out. They no longer say they should win because they've been there the longest, but because Keith, Dave, Charla, and Tara are evil "back-stabbers" who DON'T "deserve" to win. So BUGEYE TONI goes to Charla and tells her how much she loves her, how she has her BACK, then goes back to her room and tells her "deserving" partners in crime (I mean good friends) how she can't wait to get Charla booted off. You know, doing that which she accuses the "bad guys" of doing (which I never saw them do). Her hypocrisy knows no bounds, and for that she "deserves" the title from me of disgusting.
Amy up until this time has constantly insulted Charla for sticking to herself and not associating with them much. But can you REALLY blame Charla? Why WOULD she associate with these delinquents who have nothing but insults for her? Apparently she was a good judge of character and KNEW any pretend friendship by those disgusting people was fake. Later, her and Tara are enjoying each others' company and just HAVING FUN. That's just too much for Amy to take, she's nauseated and can't eat her breakfast, poor disgusting creature. Hey! Why didn't she do what she'd always been saying Charla was supposed to do, and go join them?????? Her hypocrisy is equally as unbounded as bugeye's.
"I REALLY HOPE THAT AMY AND ZACK ARE STILL TOGETHER, THEY JUST MADE THE CUTEST COUPLE."
They were an extremely dysfunctional couple. I like how he tells her that his mom left him at a department store crying all day. Then later on, after the show, admits he was like 18 at the time and he WORKED THERE. DUHHH. What kind of character flaw makes somebody tell a lie like that one??????? "I have lawyer in me" Um, so now lawyer is a genetic trait? "I'm part scottish, did you see the movie braveheart?" Please, somebody explain to Zack that movie was a work of fiction. All nationalities and races have their heroes, SOME OF THEM actually even once existed. LOL. Yeah, cute, um dysfunctional couple.