>Actually, no one knew there would
>be two winners, right? So
>Charla was the real winner.
>No matter how ruthless she
>appeared, she played the game
>and kept the money.
>I think if Keith could
>have kept all his without
>the audience or anyone knowing,
>he'd have done the same
>thing. It was a
>game that meant strategy and
>kicking others off and Charla
>won. I felt she
>was more mature than the
>rest of the cast put
>together and she was only
>21. Amazing.
I agree with you 95% I agree Charla played the game immensely maturely. Only once or twice did she delve into the highschool theatrics and immature behavior the rest of them showed pretty much the whole time. However, Keith played just as maturely IMO.
In my opinion the absolutely correct TWO won the game. I'm not surprised that Keith shared the money. He really did have a thing for Tara, a thing that was real enough they moved in together after the show. I'm also not surprised that Charla did not share the money with Dave. FACT OF THE MATTER is Keith and Charla won. Not Keith-Tara, and Charla-Dave. Keith and Charla won. Tara AND DAVE, and everybody else lost. Keith had an obvious reason to share his money with his LOVER (who lost), Charla did NOT have any obvious reason to share her money with her obsessive, "friend" (who lost). I do sometimes wonder if she didn't share the money with Dave simply because she was afraid he would take it as a sign she had feelings for him. In fact if you read interviews Dave has done since the show, I think it's pretty clear he would have.