URL: http://community.realitytvworld.com/cgi-sys/cgiwrap/rtvw2/community/dcboard.cgi
Forum: DCForumID85
Thread Number: 495
[ Go back to previous page ]

Original Message
"K-who"

Posted by Nico on 09-06-06 at 01:13 AM
What was that about? K-9 won by cheating. This is the most disappointing Contender ever. I have seen some close matches, but K-9's cheating alone should have decided this match. Walter Wright should be brought back to make this right. Is that what the show is showing, boxing a la Mike Tyson. There is only one Tyson. K-9 and his self-righteous blah, blah from the hood tale. This is a tired story now. Let's give boxers, especially black ones- a new story. K-9 is not the under-dog, I'm rooting for. Very sad day! This fight made the Contender the typical reality show, where they try and build an under-dog to rally for, but this time they picked the wrong one. He called Walter Wright- Walter Wrong- K-9 is K-none.

Table of contents

Messages in this discussion
"RE: K-who"
Posted by boltjolt on 09-06-06 at 02:25 AM
Holding aint cheating boy. It's called smart fighting. If your opponent is more mobile and has a longer jab, you get in close and in-fight. That includes holding on. You may not like it, but that's a part of boxing. Smart boxing at that. It's not a perfect world and as a Boxer you have to exploit the angles. That includes holding.

Take the fight with Ebo and Steve Williams. If Ebo would have "held" for rounds 4 & 5 he would have won. But he didn't take the smart route and got knocked out.

Fact is K-9 followed the advise of his trainer. He's a smart dude with a lot of althletic ability and he outfoxed a smart-as*s punk with a big f*ing mouth named Walter. Suc*k on it! hahaha