What was the point? Let's imagine if Eric & Danielle had arrived last. 'Eric & Danielle, you are the last team to arrive. You now must wait thirty minutes before I can check you in and give you another potential thirty-minute penalty. But don't worry: the one you're about to wait through can be corrected by the next bunch point.' When a NEL penalty stands no chance of knocking you out -- when the Yield is useless (again) -- and when the only point to running the leg may have been the scene in the noodle factory -- then why give out two NELs in a row in the first place?
Conspiracy theories about the producers saving Danny & Oswald start here.
Just another effort to confuse us? But something Phil said to Oswald & Danny about their mark for elimination makes me think that IF a team that is marked for elimination comes in last OR is last due to waiting out their penalty, they WILL BE eliminated - (even if there were another non-emlin leg).
So I think (I do that sometimes - just for fun) that if Eric/Danielle had been last they would have been Philim'd.
We would be down to 3 teams and the next leg would almost surely have the non-elim on it.
Then on to the final leg! Hummm. Could that possibly then mean that on the last leg, a team getting to the WINNING mat first (who was non-elim'd the leg before) would have to wait out the 30 minutes? ON the WINNING mat?
Good Grief, now I've got to go think some more. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Handcrafted by RollDdice