URL: http://community.realitytvworld.com/cgi-sys/cgiwrap/rtvw2/community/dcboard.cgi
Forum: DCForumID62
Thread Number: 1474
[ Go back to previous page ]

Original Message
""If you hang around with losers, you become a loser""

Posted by LionChow on 04-08-05 at 09:36 AM
Wow, The Trump certainly laid it on thick last night. How many times did he call Chris and Angie losers?

Just a hunch mind you, and please excuse my putting potential spoiler stuff out here, but... I'm thinking Chris is not going to win the job. I know... it's a bold prediction, but I really think there's a chance he won't make it.

Can you imagine how silly he must feel going back to the suite after just getting berated like that? The others have got to be busting his chops pretty badly.




Table of contents

Messages in this discussion
"RE: "If you hang around with losers, you become a loser""
Posted by buscemi on 04-08-05 at 10:01 AM
It's interesting b/c Kwame was only 3-9 in the 1st season of the show, and yet Trump thought very highly of him.

"RE: "If you hang around with losers, you become a loser""
Posted by Ricky on 04-08-05 at 10:16 AM
Trump is pretty smart. He knows that Chris is no Kwame. As a matter of fact Trump is probably going to have a hard time choosing anyone from this season to work for him.


In the end, those of us that walk away winning, win more than just a loss - Audrey, Apprentice loser


"RE: "If you hang around with losers, you become a loser""
Posted by buscemi on 04-08-05 at 10:24 AM
I was referring to Angie (who won her first task as PM) more than I was to Chris. I'm not sure about Trump having a hard time choosing, either. Both Tana and Kendra have made solid contributions on numerous tasks, both are undefeated as PMs so far, both have a good overall winning %, and neither has really made a significant mistake.

"RE: "If you hang around with losers, you become a loser""
Posted by Reeflex7 on 04-08-05 at 12:17 PM
I wonder why he didn't just fire both of them the way he did with Wes & Maria last year. I thought Wes & Maria performed worse but DT seemed a lot more disgusted with Chris and Angie, and it's obvious Chris will NEVER make it to the final two.

I have no idea what must be going through Chris's mind now. He has to know he's toast.


"RE: "If you hang around with losers, you become a loser""
Posted by lindan on 04-08-05 at 01:26 PM
Vera has quitted already. If he fires both Chris and Angie, there will be even one less Apprentice show to air. NBC might sue Trump for that.

"RE: "If you hang around with losers, you become a loser""
Posted by LionChow on 04-08-05 at 03:20 PM
Agreed. The effort of the whole bunch of them was really weak. I bet if Carolyn had seen him "hanging out" at the electronics store, he would have been gone as well.

At least Chris gets to enjoy his luxury college dorm room a little longer.




"RE: "If you hang around with losers, you become a loser""
Posted by ARnutz on 04-08-05 at 02:49 PM
He did really lay it on thick last night.

Ummm... I don't think it's a real spoiler predicting that Chris won't win the job. I could tell that several weeks ago that he wouldn't make it.

I predict he won't make it to the final four. Again, not spoiling... just based on his performance so far.


I bet he's just being kept around for the drama and to give us folks something to talk about.



'nutz: Proud member of the inoffensive OT Triumvirate... and Shroomhater! - shroom go boom!


"RE: "If you hang around with losers, you become a loser""
Posted by LionChow on 04-08-05 at 03:18 PM
>Ummm... I don't think it's a
>real spoiler predicting that Chris
>won't win the job. I
>could tell that several weeks
>ago that he wouldn't make
>it.

AR... I'm surprised with you!

Granted it was a weak joke, but I thought the sarcasm was sufficient to shine through!




"RE: "If you hang around with losers, you become a loser""
Posted by Harrison on 04-08-05 at 03:57 PM
For what it's worth, Chow, I read the sarcasm in your post.



"RE: "If you hang around with losers, you become a loser""
Posted by Starsfan on 04-08-05 at 04:03 PM
ARnutz's Sarcasm detector is broken =P
I think Bren could pull it off =) he'll probably do well in the interviews if he gets that far, as from what Ive seen, he does very well with people =P

"RE: "If you hang around with losers, you become a loser""
Posted by ARnutz on 04-08-05 at 04:09 PM
LAST EDITED ON 04-08-05 AT 04:09 PM (EST)

ARnutz's Sarcasm detector is broken


*snort*

Sorry guys! Having a migraine headache kinda puts a damper on the sense of humor.

ETA: Welcome to the boards!!!


LionChow, I knew you were joking! Guess my post didn't make that clear.


"RE: "If you hang around with losers, you become a loser""
Posted by LionChow on 04-08-05 at 04:13 PM
> LionChow, I knew you were joking! Guess my post didn't make
that clear.


Shoot!

Now my detector is broken.




"RE: "If you hang around with losers, you become a loser""
Posted by ARnutz on 04-08-05 at 04:19 PM
Nah, you're fine. I don't think my post sounded funny at all now that I read it again!


I take full responsibilty for my broken sarcasm meter!



'nutz: Proud member of the inoffensive OT Triumvirate... and Shroomhater! - shroom go boom!


"RE: "If you hang around with losers, you become a loser""
Posted by SLBell on 04-10-05 at 04:17 PM
LAST EDITED ON 04-10-05 AT 04:18 PM (EST)

>I bet he's just being kept
>around for the drama and
>to give us folks something
>to talk about.

Hey all!

I personally think Chris is being kept around just to see if anyone of the appretice-wanna-bes (DT brown nosers) can control him. Trump thrives on control (duh!). He eats, drinks and breathes it. Chris is just a tool for Trump to weed out those who cannot control him.

SBell


"I am not a fan of Angie's but she really got a raw deal in this task"
Posted by tannl on 04-08-05 at 04:16 PM
If Trump made that statement to me, I would have told him where he could put his job. They lost this task because Alex took no responsibility. He did very little. He did not full in for the absence Chris who wasted valuable time waiting for a credit card. This left Angie alone to do all the work while Alex and Chris went AWOL.

"RE: I am not a fan of Angie's but she really got a raw deal in this task"
Posted by noone67 on 04-08-05 at 09:44 PM
I think Angie's mistake was not going after Alex. That 'loser by association' thing is crap. Alex was head when he was on the other team and he was exactly the same...delegated ALL the work..did nothing...and lost the task. I so wanted Alex to get fired. But obviously Trump sees Alex with rose coloured glasses.

"RE: I am not a fan of Angie's but she really got a raw deal in this task"
Posted by aaron2kristie on 04-08-05 at 11:40 PM

>I so wanted Alex to
>get fired. But obviously
>Trump sees Alex with rose
>coloured glasses.


I think you hit the nail on the head. Trump said Alex was an all star performer before he got on this loser team. Yeah right! He's the next Bill I can just see it. Man that sucks!

And I would have walked out too when Trump called Angie and Chris losers. What a jerk he is! That was WAY Harsh!


"RE: I am not a fan of Angie's but she really got a raw deal in this task"
Posted by mamamelly on 04-10-05 at 12:24 PM
I think that instead of Alex being a loser by association when he was picked to go to Net Worth, he was more of a winner by association when he was part of Magna, especially when they got Tana. On Magna, he was surrounded by better, less psychotic candidates, and he managed to stay pretty much UTR. When he came over to Net Worth, it has become more obvious that he doesn't really contribute. Maybe if DT removed his rose coloured glasses, he will start to see this.

"RE: I am not a fan of Angie's but she really got a raw deal in this task"
Posted by MediaMan on 04-11-05 at 10:22 PM
LAST EDITED ON 04-13-05 AT 02:32 PM (EST)

Mamamelly,

I totally agree with you. I've paid close attention to alex, his win in the playstation billboard grafitti task was sheer luck.

Alex did not "plan" to solicit feedback from passerbys in the neighborhood, and her certainly failed to solicit feedback from the target market in the American Eagle task... just goes to show, he's been a week player surrounded by talent and has been ablt to fly UTR until he landed at Net Worth.

Further, there's no doubt Angie choked, but I blam alex for overwhelming her by delegating too much responsibility while he and chris appeared to contribute very little.

The decision by trump is inconsistent, however, I bet he gets far more than the 20 minutes of recaps encapsulating a task that took some 30+ hours... so, all i can say... i wonder what he saw, what information that he had access to that we didn't have.

Lastly - assuming Trump had access to the same info we've had, and if the choice was to HIRE either Alex or Angie, it would be a very tough call. Both are weak candidates, and Trump might have been looking at it as "picking someone to stay (hire)" as opposed to "picking someone to go (fire)". From this perspective, angie might have a little more "mistakes" in her corner even though its so close I'd opt for a coin toss!

MediaMan
Author of the weekly Apprentice Newsletter at http://tinyurl.com/62c74
Practical business lessons & insightful analysis
(complete with podcasts and RSS feeds)


"RE: I am not a fan of Angie's but she really got a raw deal in this task"
Posted by singer on 04-11-05 at 09:13 AM
>If Trump made that statement to
>me, I would have told
>him where he could put
>his job. They lost this
>task because Alex took no
>responsibility. He did very little.
>He did not full in
>for the absence Chris who
>wasted valuable time waiting for
>a credit card. This left
>Angie alone to do all
>the work while Alex and
>Chris went AWOL.


In total agreement. Wonder why The Donald was so hell-bent on getting rid of the one person who did most, if not all, of the work? And how does the non-performance of Alex make him a "winner" in The Donald's estimation? I remain convinced that the winner is pre-determined BEFORE they even start shooting, which is in line with Pam's assessment from last season.

--Singer


"RE: "If you hang around with losers, you become a loser""
Posted by HistoryDetective on 04-09-05 at 07:27 AM
I figured they were all becoming losers because they are hanging out with Donald Trump.


a sig by syren
Donald Trump puts the ass in class.


"RE: Trump"
Posted by SLBell on 04-12-05 at 11:56 AM
What is it about money that makes DT think he can treat people like s***. One has nothing to do with the other. I can just see him as a small boy in short pants throwing trantrums for not getting what he wants. For a man like this to get what he wants is a dangerous thing as he is incapable of handing the responsibility that comes with great wealth. People are not for chewing up and spitting out simply because you have alot of green paper. My God, how would he define himself without it?

My guess for the final three:
Alex (Trump Stepford Employee)
Craig
Tana

SBell