LAST EDITED ON 07-07-15 AT 09:33 AM (EST)Da'Vonne gets call #7? No way! I'll eat a room full of hats if that wasn't engineered by production.
But anyway, this means that 3 voters selected by Da'Vonne can't vote against her.
So, I've forgotten the exact wording of the announcement.
1. Are the 3 votes just neutralized?
2. Or by not getting to vote Da'Vonne would they be forced to cast their votes for Meg?
If it's #1, with 9 votes total eligible and 5 for eviction there should still be enough to evict Da'Vonne.
If it's #2, and 3 of the 5 votes not to evict Da'Vonne in the bag, it would only take a miffed Becky + one to save her.
Somehow I get the idea that it's #1. Da'Vonne gets to select three voters that can't cast a vote.
Da'Vonne has three days to sway either 5 or 2 votes. But after watching her strategic train wreck of a game, it won't happen. I'm guessing that it will be unanimous to evict her anyway. Audrey could throw in another unexpected vote just to cause confusion as she did last time.
Don't like this twist, but it does introduce some basis for drama in the eviction, and room for doubt.
.
>Da'Vonne gets call #7? No way!
>I'll eat a room full
>of hats if that wasn't
>engineered by production. I'm pretty sure all the hats are safe. In BB, we should always expect the interference. This was easy: Just wait until Da is the only one close to the phone.
>But anyway, this means that 3
>voters selected by Da'Vonne can't
>vote against her.
>So, I've forgotten the exact wording
>of the announcement.
>1. Are the 3 votes just
>neutralized?
When I heard the twist, that was what I thought it meant. Da will be able to rob three players of their "constitutional" right to vote. (Something our Conservatives here in Canada tried with their own version of the telephone twist in the last election!)
>Da'Vonne has three days to sway
>either 5 or 2 votes.
>But after watching her strategic
>train wreck of a game,
>it won't happen.
It's funny how everyone with an apostrophe in their name turns out to be a catastrophe. Na'Onka, J'Tia and now this one.
>Don't like this twist, but it
>does introduce some basis for
>drama in the eviction, and
>room for doubt.
Another thing we can always expect in BB is to have the house vote unanimously.