LAST EDITED ON 09-04-02 AT 11:11 PM (EST)

Why didn't she veto AMY ??? Is she brain dead?

These peeps confuse me more every day. I can accept dumb. I don't know what this is. It isn't even irrational enough to be insanity.

Edited to curtsey now that I am a daytime soap guest star. I really love the DAW descriptions.

• 'Cause she can't,AyaK, 02:26 AM, 09-05-02
  • RE: 'Cause she can't,TechNoir, 10:02 AM, 09-05-02
• RE: What's with Amy's non-veto?,LadyT, 06:51 AM, 09-05-02
  • RE: What's with Amy's non-veto?,AMAI, 10:15 AM, 09-05-02
    • RE: What's with Amy's non-veto?,SurvivinDawg, 10:55 AM, 09-05-02

If you win veto and you're a nominee, you can't veto yourself -- only the other person.

Because Roddy has Amy wrapped around his finger, he expected her to use the veto the only way she could: to save him (of course, Amy would have been booted had she done so, but Roddy expects people to sacrifice themselves for him). Apparently, she almost did, but Roddy pushed her too hard, and she rebelled at the last minute.

Well that explains it. The rules are sometimes a little obscure.

Well, of course she is brain dead. Why did I ask?

She may be brain dead...

Amy might be tossed anyway, just like Roddy said.

In a convo following POV meeting, (on live feeds) Jason, Dani & Lisa were discussing how one vote would go to Roddy and 2 votes to boot Amy. This is at TVCH on the Monday lf reports, logged at 1:55 pm

The latest that I've seen is that RODDY is going to be ousted 3-0. His treatment of AMY has led to a desire not to even give him a sympathy vote.

Last (Wednesday) night, RODDY actually asked AMY if she knew he was going to be waxed. She paused a good bit, then said she wasn't sure, and never had been sure of any week's vote.

Contradictions don't exist. If you are faced with a contradiction, check your premises. You will find that one of them is wrong. -- Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged