Plain and simple he was robbed. K-9 had nothing on himand even he sid if I had to win ugly I'll take it.

The BizBroker

• RE: Walter was robbed,poetrocity, 00:43 AM, 09-06-06
• RE: Walter was robbed,boltjolt, 02:32 AM, 09-06-06
  • RE: Walter was robbed,SDcalibur, 09:31 PM, 09-08-06
    • RE: Walter was robbed,SDcalibur, 09:36 PM, 09-08-06

LAST EDITED ON 09-06-06 AT 01:03 AM (EST)

LAST EDITED ON 09-06-06 AT 00:46 AM (EST)

You do know we don't watch every round in entirety? Walter was not robbed, going into the 5th I would say tie, I had K9 winning first 2 and the 5th. I would say k9 won, even after the crappy ref was completely one sided, still didn't take k9 out of it.

I must say, K9 got the better of wright even when wright had him in the ropes. Walter is a good fighter, but I would have also given K9 the victory. They should at least put these fights up on their website or something to watch them round by round in entirety.

Yeah Walter was robbed. by his own lack of effort. He failed to throw punches in round 5 and that's why he lost. As for winning ugly; if you're a pragmatist you'll say the same thing. Quick... go look up pragmatist. ha

walter was robbed. k-9 is a whack FIGHTER, pretty much all his hits came when he held Walter. whackkkk

but like i said you must go on with everything that came out, walter was the beater boxer but there must have been something that the judges saw that i didnt. Even if he had a big mouth he came out a Boxer and will be great one day.