URL: http://community.realitytvworld.com/cgi-sys/cgiwrap/rtvw2/community/dcboard.cgi
Forum: DCForumID66
Thread Number: 24
[ Go back to previous page ]
Original Message
"Things we learned: Episode #3."
Posted by Estee on 03-09-04 at 09:43 AM
1. So much for the 'gang up on the new arrival' strategy. Looks like the fresh meat gets one week of guaranteed shelf life before the plastic wrapper has to come off. Not that the senior Edenists will normally be in a position to target anyone -- so far, the execution setups have been random fire into the crowd --but they won't be able to force an immediate U-turn back onto the raft.
2. Thank you, Michael, for helping to prove my initial impression: they were, at least in part, casting people who thought $54,000 a year (post-taxes and accountant fees) would be an improvement over what they were getting in their daily jobs.
3. Scottsdale? Again? Is there a mandatory minimum that we're not aware of?
4. The real Banishment Temple message: 'Khalilah, you have demonstrated unshakable loyalty to your friend and a willingness to sacrifice your own potential happiness to give another a little more time in which to find it. We at FOX would like to say that you never should have been cast on this show in the first place. Get out.'
5. Looks like the doling out of four chocolate bites post-Temple may be the only consistent aspect of the money situation. The producers want to keep those coins in circulation. The chance of in-hotel games, playing for the transfer or protection of prize money, is starting to go up.
6. Bring back Steve and Randi...

Table of contents
Messages in this discussion
"RE: Things we learned: Episode #3."
Posted by Loree on 03-09-04 at 09:54 AM
If they keep sending people home and introducing new people at this speed - will we ever remember who is who?
"RE: Things we learned: Episode #3."
Posted by Estee on 03-09-04 at 09:59 AM
Don't ask me. I can't even remember the host.
"RE: Things we learned: Episode #3."
Posted by Oscirus on 03-09-04 at 06:38 PM
With such horrible editing, stupid people, and dumb twists this is like the Bob sagat of reality shows.

How many times were they going to establish the fact that khalilah wasn't going to vote for neveen i got th poin after the frist 50 times.


"RE: Things we learned: Episode #3."
Posted by volsfan on 03-09-04 at 07:29 PM
Editing is terrible as well. I think we should keep a running tally of how cameramen we see in each episode.

I like change but good grief...talk about a revoving door!


Director of Public Relations for GAWKUR!

"Uh... there was an Episode 3?"
Posted by TeamJoisey on 03-09-04 at 10:46 PM
Not in my house. Even my dog is above this.
"RE: Things we learned: Episode #3."
Posted by frankz on 03-10-04 at 10:15 AM
So I still don't get why Khalilah quit to save Neveen. Neveen was already safe because Khalilah wouldn't cast a unanimous vote. So what the hell? Why didn't she just not make her vote and take her 1 in 3 chances to stay? To save Neveen and Brooke from having to "make that tough choice"? Idiotic.
What a ridiculous show. Makes absolutely no sense. But, like a train wreck, I'll continue to watch.
And Scottsdale again? Is reality show contestant a cottage industry there? What is it about Scottsdale that attracts media whores?
"RE: Things we learned: Episode #3."
Posted by teejax22 on 03-10-04 at 12:19 PM
I was thinking the same thing about Khalilah quitting. But I guess when you look at it if Brooke and Naveen had to vote, the decision will be equally split because each person is gonna want to save the person that voted to save them initially. Plus I don't know how it would play out with all the stupid twists and turns this show has.