LAST EDITED ON 06-23-06 AT 00:01 AM (EST) Charla did not use Dave. You're seeing in the show what you WANT to see apparently. I saw the show too, and did not see what you guys see. Charla consistently from start to finish went out of her way to show and tell Dave that she was not interested in him in any other way than partner for the game. I mean is it possible to make it any more clear to somebody you AREN'T INTERESTED than to not only tell him you don't like him to touch you, but to tell him that in front of everybody? How could she POSSIBLY have made her feelings any clearer. She wouldn't sleep with him, she didn't even want him to touch her. Somebody illuminate for me how in the world her behavior could be taken as leading him on.
Charla didn't owe Dave a dime. IF she owed anybody any money, it would be Keith. It was not Dave that got her to the end, it was Keith. Dave lost. It is spelled L O S T. Dave lost because he made a lot of enemies, so he ACTUALLY lost the game for Charla too, if you use a rational mind and THINK ABOUT THAT.
There is a logical reason Keith shared his money with Tara. He and Tara were actually a couple (Dave and Charla were not). Keith and Tara moved in together after the show and remain close though they separated. I'll bet you that had Keith and Tara had NO intimate feelings towards one another whatsoever, he'd not have shared the money.
There was really no logical reason to share the money with Dave. You will say "but Dave got her to the end". No he did not. He got her to ALMOST the end. I mean if you even believe that probably the most enemied guy on the show was an advantage to her. But the fact was he did NOT get her to the end, in the end there was 2 winners, not 4. Keith and Charla won, EVERYBODY else lost. As stated before there was a VERY LOGICAL reason Keith shared his half; NO such reason existed for Charla except in small and IMO irrational minds.