Either way a person wants to spin it both Peih Gee/Jamie and James could be seen as right or wrong.One could argue that challenges are meant to try hard in, to win. Therefore James would be seen as in the right. However, one could easily say that tribe loyalty is more important which makes Peih Gee/Jaime right and James wrong for assisting the oppossing tribe in winning the challenge against his original.
Peih Gee and Jamie did what they felt needed to be done. They clearly both want to win and know that it can be hard to do anything with low tribe numbers during merge. They felt that they were right to save two of their tribe mates who were no longer officially part of their tribe. To be honest, it's not a bad idea...it's the execution that matters...and honestly the giggling and obiviousness of the whole ordeal could be the boot to kick them in the tush or it could possibly have no affect at all.
>However, one could easily
>say that tribe loyalty is
>more important which makes Peih
>Gee/Jaime right and James wrong
>for assisting the oppossing tribe
>in winning the challenge against
>his original.
>
>Sorry but this makes no sense at all. Why would James purposely lose to help his original tribe? It would just result in either he or Aaron getting voted off, the latter of which happenned.
Strategy-wise the two girls did right in throwing the challeng. What they did wrong was the laughing about it. That was not cool!