|
|
PLEASE NOTE: The Reality TV World Message Boards are filled with desperate
attention-seekers pretending to be one big happy PG/PG13-rated family. Don't
be fooled. Trying to get everyone to agree with you is like herding cats,
but intolerance for other viewpoints is NOT welcome and respect for other
posters IS required at all times. Jump in and play, and you'll soon find out
how easy it is to fit in, but save your drama for your mama. All members are
encouraged to read the
complete guidelines.
As entertainment critic Roger
Ebert once said, "If you disagree with something I write, tell me so, argue
with me, correct me--but don't tell me to shut up. That's not the American way."
|
|
"Men vs. women"
mrc 10020 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"
|
03-05-04, 09:18 AM (EST)
|
"Men vs. women" |
Has anyone else noticed that since The Donald put the men and women together, the women have been dropping like flies? I'll leave it at that--discuss among yourselves!
|
Alert |
Edit |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
| |
CarlosCruz 18 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Got Milk? Spokesperson"
|
03-05-04, 09:23 AM (EST)
|
1. "RE: Men vs. women" |
Yep, you are right! Why is that? When there was only one team with memebers of the softer sex, that was the only team that could play the "sex sells" card. No that advantage is even out. All the "challenges" are sale related and it is always good to have some "eye candy" in the sales team. But if both team have it none of them has the extra advantage.
|
Remove |
Alert |
Edit |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
| |
|
|
Pepito 587 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Reality Show Commentator"
|
03-05-04, 11:13 AM (EST)
|
3. "RE: Men vs. Women" |
Yes, I have noticed this. It became most obvious with Ereka for not bringing Katrina into the boardroom last week. All the other PM's were allowed to make such a decision, but Ereka was belittled for her decision. It was disrepectful of her. Usually, DT bawls out one candidate, points out flaws, then turns and bawls out another, and fires the second. During Ereka's boardroom, neither of the men got bawled out, only Ereka got bawled out like a child, for her personality, not the work that she did, then fired. It was chauvinistic. Not that Ereka was my favourite or had any chance of winning, but her termination was unfair and poorly handled.I don't think that all the women have been "too emotional". They are generally smaller, have higher voices, longer hair, and can express their feelings more easily than the typical man. In other words, haha, they are women. Women all across the country are like this. If you want to work happily and peacefully in the workplace, it is good to accept this, even enjoy it. Calling them "emotional" because they possess feminine traits is discriminatory. I hope they don't start firing the men for being too hairy or for playing too much basketball or something... Having emotions is not the problem. When one ACTS out their emotions without understanding or perhaps even being aware of these emotions or their causes is when you get arrogant, self-centered, surly, pouting, uncooperative behaviour, like Nick. He is a stick of emotionally charged dynamite. I hope he explodes.
|
Remove |
Alert |
Edit |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
rtrader 277 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Network TV Show Guest Star"
|
03-05-04, 09:29 PM (EST)
|
6. "RE: Men vs. women" |
When a team goes on a long winning streak (like the all women's Protege), the victories protect the team members who probably should get fired. Also, once the teams get too imbalanced, critical mass comes into play and it's harder in any competition to win if your on the team with fewer people. Once the teams got mixed, it allowed Trump to get rid of some of the protected players (all of them women because they were always on the winning team for the first few weeks). One thing that seems to be fairer after the 'corporate reshuffle' is that Trump is not allowing the teams to get too imbalanced. Once a team is down by two, they get to pick one from the other team. That wasn't happening during the first four weeks of the show.
|
Remove |
Alert |
Edit |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
| |
|
shellbookwoman 64 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Hollywood Squares Square"
|
03-05-04, 09:36 PM (EST)
|
7. "RE: Men vs. women" |
LAST EDITED ON 03-05-04 AT 09:37 PM (EST)I agree, rtrader. The weaker men were all dropped early, while the women were protected by the wins. I imagine in the next season, they'll even up teams more often and not let the imbalance get so bad. Hopefully they'll start with coed teams from the start as well. <i>One thing that seems to be fairer after the 'corporate reshuffle' is that Trump is not allowing the teams to get too imbalanced. Once a team is down by two, they get to pick one from the other team. That wasn't happening during the first four weeks of the show.</i> I think it would be more fair if the traded player was chosen randomly. The way it is, it seems to reward failure. Or it could be really snarky and catty--let the winning team choose a player to send over. Then it would have been Tammy and Omarosa bouncing like ping pong balls from team to team!
|
Remove |
Alert |
Edit |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
| |
|
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
|
|