|
|
PLEASE NOTE: The Reality TV World Message Boards are filled with desperate
attention-seekers pretending to be one big happy PG/PG13-rated family. Don't
be fooled. Trying to get everyone to agree with you is like herding cats,
but intolerance for other viewpoints is NOT welcome and respect for other
posters IS required at all times. Jump in and play, and you'll soon find out
how easy it is to fit in, but save your drama for your mama. All members are
encouraged to read the
complete guidelines.
As entertainment critic Roger
Ebert once said, "If you disagree with something I write, tell me so, argue
with me, correct me--but don't tell me to shut up. That's not the American way."
|
|
"an entertaining travesty of a season"
iltarion 1791 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Herbal Healing Drugs Endorser"
|
03-13-10, 08:27 AM (EST)
|
1. "RE: an entertaining travesty of a season" |
It has been an up and down season, starting with one of the best premiers ever, but since then we've only had the Cirie blindside, otherwise, very predictable boots. Pre-show alliances were the problem with the first All Stars and one of the main reasons why JP didn't want to do another one until long after that (general bad attitudes by the players being the other main reason.) I agree that could end up being a problem here as well. It might have been unfair to Tom, Stephanie and Colby to have Amanda, James and Cirie together on their tribe. On the other hand, JT and Candice were there to balance the power, and they failed to recruit them. It isn't production's fault that the Heroes have been so inept and made the voting all one-sided. Because of that, out of necessity mostly, the editing has focused on the Heroes, with only Rob, Russell, and Coach getting any story for the Villians, though Parvati still has a chance as well. Sandra, Jerri and Tyson have been partially ignored, and Courtney, Danielle, and Randy entirely ignored. I have found the edit inconsistent, but they may be trying to throw us off by doing that. So, that may be intentional, and props to them if it is because I have to admit I have no idea where this is going right now. I can say that after setting Rob up as the Hero-like Villian, and Russell as the #1 Villian, if Russell eliminates Rob, this season will go onto the crap pile for me and many others. Even though they appeared to set that up last episode, I still can't believe they would do that. It would be like having Clint Eastwood lose in the gunfight at the end of Pale Rider. >
|
Remove |
Alert |
Edit |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
| |
 |
krismiss2us 768 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Fitness Correspondent"
|
03-14-10, 04:59 PM (EST)
|
2. "RE: an entertaining travesty of a season" |
to me, that's the perfect end to a clint eastwood movie matter of fact, the best john wayne movie: Cowboys. Why? Cuz he died at the end. So GO RUSSELL!
|
Remove |
Alert |
Edit |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
| |
 |
Spanky68 8092 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"
|
03-22-10, 08:44 AM (EST)
|
3. "RE: an entertaining travesty of a season" |
I think the problem causing some people like Randy and Tyson to be left out of the editing mix is that you have SO MANY interesting people on this season that you can't fit many story lines into the 1 hour format. Thus it is inevitable that you leave some people out. I think that when they boot a few more contestants, you will see more of those UTR people getting face time.
|
Remove |
Alert |
Edit |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
| |
 |
|
Zimbochick 35 desperate attention whore postings DAW Level: "Beauty Pageant Celebrity Judge"
|
03-25-10, 08:15 AM (EST)
|
7. "RE: an entertaining travesty of a season" |
One of the problems as I see it is that on the Villains you have a lot of good physical players, and very good strategic players. On Heroes you have nice guys, but apart from JT, none of them are both physical and strategic. James is a good physical player, but not so mentally. Amanda and Colby are both disappointing this season, and were stronger previously. Getting rid of Stephenie was a stupid move that cost them challenges.
|
Remove |
Alert |
Edit |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
| |
|
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
|
|